Teams

Wiuff/Memphis

2025 Mixed 18 & Over - Memphis · 3.5 Mixed 18 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-07-10vs Schneiderman/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesE Cavett Ostner / Courtney Woodmansee vs Chris Bay / Jessica Flesch2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Eason / Shanna Eason vs Tina Schneiderman / David van Horn6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLauren Wiuff / Chris Wood vs Constance Conley / Tommy Conley6-3, 6-2
2025-06-21vs Wright/MemphisWon 21
L#1 DoublesKristen Alexander / Patrick Kerley vs Dusty Nelson / Margaret Martin6-2, 1-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChris Wood / Jess Flanders vs Wendi Mihalko / Benjamin Jagoe6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesE Cavett Ostner / Shanna Eason vs Blaire Bobo / Taylor Bobo3-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Brackett/MemphisLost 03
L#1 DoublesBerkeley Burbank / Margaret Johnson vs Caden LeBlanc / Kelly Kuenzinger4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChris Wood / Courtney Woodmansee vs Aimee Goforth / Luca Lemee0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKristen Alexander / Richard Kuebler vs Brandon Brackett / Hannah Gilliam6-3, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mixed 18 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Shanna Eason
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.43
Patrick Kerley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Mallory Walsh
published
3.27
Berkeley Burbank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Jess Flanders
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Courtney Woodmansee
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.15
Richard Kuebler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Kristen Alexander
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.96
Lauren Wiuff
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Brian Eason
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.48
Emily Eber
published
E Cavett Ostner
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shanna Eason
49W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Patrick Kerley
12W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Mallory Walsh
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Berkeley Burbank
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
Jess Flanders
28W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Courtney Woodmansee
24W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Richard Kuebler
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%1%
3.15
Kristen Alexander
19W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.99
Lauren Wiuff
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.96
3
Brian Eason
22W–15L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
Emily Eber
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%57%43%
2.48
E Cavett Ostner
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.