Teams

Cady 9.0 40+

2022 Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over · Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 9.0

15 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-08-11vs HoKova 9.0 40+Won 21
L#1 DoublesHillary Kuker / Richard Laukitis vs DONALD CRAWLEY / Heather Herman3-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Luis Lozano vs Virginia Fung / James Peterson6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJustin Cady / Barbara Citrano vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-08-06vs HoKova 9.0 40+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMaureen Kolb / Luis Lozano vs Virginia Fung / James Peterson3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-28vs HoKova 9.0 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Susan Rhee vs Luis Ruiz / Anita Pasumarthy3-6, 6-3, 0-1
2022-07-14vs HoKova 9.0 40+Won 10
W#3 DoublesRichard Laukitis / Hillary Kuker vs Wendy Heger / Doug DeLawter6-4, 6-2
2022-07-10vs HoKova 9.0 40+Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLeonard Tetteh / Inese Williamson vs Marketa Chromkova / Luis Ruiz4-6, 3-6
2022-06-29vs HoKova 9.0 40+Lost 02
L#1 DoublesSarah Dumansky / Richard Laukitis vs James Daniel Kohr II / Jaime Lewis4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesGregory Chambers / Maureen Kolb vs Luis Ruiz / Nita Elie0-6, 3-6
2022-06-20vs HoKova 9.0 40+Split 11
W#1 DoublesInese Williamson / Leonard Tetteh vs Wendy Heger / Hung Nguyen6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesMatthew Geppi / Susan Rhee vs Henry Cha / Jean Lim1-6, 4-6
2022-06-06vs HoKova 9.0 40+Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJustin Cady / Farzaneh Navid vs Hung Nguyen / Nita Elie3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Columbia Mixed 40 & Over 9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.22 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.07
Inese Williamson
published 5
4.40
Matthew Geppi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.40
Luis Lozano
published
4.32
Bill Bartolotta
published 4.5
4.31
Leonard Tetteh
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.27
Maureen Kolb
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Gregory Chambers
published 4.5
4.21
Hillary Kuker
published 4.5
4.19
Richard Laukitis
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.18
Michele Brammer
published
4.10
Barbara Citrano
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.09
Farzaneh Navid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Susan Rhee
published
3.85
David Trang
published 4.5
3.75
Justin Cady
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Farzaneh Navid + Justin Cady4353% games−1.1% vs expected
Leonard Tetteh + Maureen Kolb4551% gamesnot enough data
Farzaneh Navid + Leonard Tetteh303 matchesnot enough data
Leonard Tetteh + Hillary Kuker213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Inese Williamson
28W–15L career · no lines in 2022
<1%30%70%
5.07
4.5
Matthew Geppi
225W–81L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
4.40
Luis Lozano
68W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%79%21%
4.40
4.5
Bill Bartolotta
12W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
4.32
4.5
Leonard Tetteh
338W–208L career · 2 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
4.31
4.5
Maureen Kolb
119W–83L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Gregory Chambers
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Hillary Kuker
7W–3L career · type A · no lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Richard Laukitis
167W–99L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
4.19
Michele Brammer
9W–8L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
4.18
4.5
Barbara Citrano
63W–83L career · 1 line in 2022
22%78%<1%
4.10
4
Farzaneh Navid
119W–111L career · 1 line in 2022
<1%25%75%
4.09
Susan Rhee
32W–20L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.90
4.5
David Trang
0W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
88%12%<1%
3.85
Justin Cady
27W–19L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.