Teams

LLW-CV-Willsey

2022 CV Masters' 70s League · CV-Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-02-17vs CV-GiacominiWon 20
W#3 DoublesLyn Matson / Loretta Gohd vs Linda Conn / Ellen Boyer6-2, 6-1
W#5 DoublesPaula Wells / Gretia Capri vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-02-10Won 10
W#4 DoublesGretia Capri / Paula Wells vs Jaki Markarian / JUDY MCLENNAN6-1, 6-4
2022-02-03vs CV-RingerWon 20
W#4 DoublesPaula Wells / Pamela Hay vs Theresa Brown / Diane Fass7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#5 DoublesPetra Gellner / Karen Felton vs Reney Schild / Rebecca Bratlien6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2022-01-27vs CV-GiacominiWon 20
W#3 DoublesLyn Matson / Loretta Gohd vs Ellen Boyer / Sandy Spurrell1-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#5 DoublesPaula Wells / Karen Felton vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-01-20vs CV-ParkersonLost 01
L#4 DoublesGretia Capri / Karen Felton vs Tyra Seymour / Nancy Yazel5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for CV-Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.02 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Loretta Gohd
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Hiyam van der Wilde
published 3.5
3.03
Karen Felton
usually #5 Doubles 67%, also #4 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Paula Wells
usually #5 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published 3
Leslie Zauher
published
Lyn Matson
published
Lynne Washington
published
Maria Quinn
published 0
Pamela Hay
published
Petra Gellner
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Petra Gellner + Karen Felton123 matchesnot enough data
Paula Wells + Karen Felton123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Loretta Gohd
70W–46L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Hiyam van der Wilde
2W–5L career · no lines in 2022
26%74%<1%
3.08
3
Karen Felton
29W–49L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Paula Wells
27W–40L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%14%
2.86
Leslie Zauher
3W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lyn Matson
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lynne Washington
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
0
Maria Quinn
9W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Pamela Hay
2W–10L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Petra Gellner
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.