Teams

Northshore

2025 Corpus Christi 40 & Over USTA League · Forty & Over Mens 3.5

11 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-02-13vs Tennis RodmanWon 31
W#1 DoublesJose Trevino / Brent Hopkins vs Preston Ley / Ryan Read6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesStephen Pina vs David Lopez6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJohn Burnette / Paul Jamison vs Roger Amador / Jason Hawkins3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesAlfredo Trevino / Rodrigo Kessler vs John Borkowski / Anil Gungor6-4, 4-6, 1-0
2025-02-04vs Tennis RodmanSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJohn Burnette / Paul Jamison vs Steven Trigger / Jason Hawkins6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesDaniel Millan vs Chandra Sanwal4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJose Trevino / Alfredo Trevino vs Anil Gungor / John Borkowski6-3, 3-3
L#3 DoublesGerardo Trevino / Douglas Martin vs Leo Cortez / David Lopez4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Forty & Over Mens 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
David Clemons
published 3.5
3.53
Daniel Millan
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.49
Brent Hopkins
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Stephen Pina
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.31
Jose Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Alan Stafford
published 3.5
3.17
John Burnette
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.08
Paul Jamison
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.05
Gerardo Trevino
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.93
Alfredo Trevino
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Rodrigo Kessler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brent Hopkins + Jose Trevino6161% games+8.9% vs expected
John Burnette + Paul Jamison2539% gamesnot enough data
Alfredo Trevino + Jose Trevino033 matchesnot enough data
Alfredo Trevino + Gerardo Trevino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
David Clemons
33W–14L career · no lines in 2025
<1%40%60%
3.54
4
Daniel Millan
11W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.53
3.5
Brent Hopkins
34W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Stephen Pina
23W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%69%31%
3.43
Jose Trevino
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.31
3.5
Alan Stafford
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
John Burnette
10W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Paul Jamison
35W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Gerardo Trevino
2W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.05
3.5
Alfredo Trevino
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.93
Rodrigo Kessler
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.