Teams

Nair/Memphis

2025 Adult 40 & Over-Memphis · 3.5 Women 40 & over

16 players · average NTRP 3.10 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-04-13vs Stout/MemphisWon 32
W#1 DoublesSusana Cunningham / Lisa Evans vs Virginia Palacio / Krista Weber6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesMorgan Pippen vs Dana Stout6-4, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmasa Lacy / Jennifer Sigan vs Leslie Darling / Jo Picha3-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesDeepa Nair / Ann Yackel vs Mary Durham / Ellen Skinner6-4, 6-4
L#4 DoublesChing Cushing-Murray / Amy Worrell Sterling vs Terrie Dietsch / Susan Northen-Lacy1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Stout/MemphisSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLisa Evans / Susana Cunningham vs Jo Picha / Debbie Pacheco7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMaricela Robles-Murguia vs Brooke Robinson6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Yackel / Tarshian Moon vs Courtney Perrin / Sandra Horn7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMorgan Pippen / Deepa Nair vs Terrie Dietsch / Ellen Skinner5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women 40 & over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.18
Susana Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Maricela Robles-Murguia
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.03
Ann Yackel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Jennifer Sigan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.87
Morgan Pippen
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.85
Amasa Lacy
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Kathye Sbravati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Deepa Nair
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.68
Tarshian Moon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.66
Ching Cushing-Murray
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.61
Letitia Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.47
Amy Worrell Sterling
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Melody Greene
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.44
Jennifer Larkin
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
2.42
Melissa Taras
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Pamela Pierski
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maricela Robles-Murguia + Ann Yackel4259% games+7.7% vs expected
Deepa Nair + Ann Yackel6059% games+6.0% vs expected
Amy Worrell Sterling + Melissa Taras123 matchesnot enough data
Amy Worrell Sterling + Ching Cushing-Murray033 matchesnot enough data
Deepa Nair + Letitia Phillips123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Susana Cunningham
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.18
Maricela Robles-Murguia
24W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.14
3.5
Ann Yackel
23W–21L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03
Jennifer Sigan
19W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Morgan Pippen
15W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
3
Amasa Lacy
29W–32L career · 9 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Kathye Sbravati
5W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.79
3
Deepa Nair
22W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Tarshian Moon
31W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
9%89%1%
2.68
3
Ching Cushing-Murray
13W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
2.66
Letitia Phillips
10W–20L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
2.61
3
Amy Worrell Sterling
5W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Melody Greene
9W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
62%38%<1%
2.46
Jennifer Larkin
7W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.44
Melissa Taras
5W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.42
Pamela Pierski
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.