Teams

Skyview 55 Fullerton

2025 Marion Adult 55 & Over · 7.0 Adult Men 55 & Over

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-03-23vs Marion/James/55&Over7.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesEric Osterchrist / Richard Hurley vs Chris Donahue / Eric Nickerson6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMonty Shelton / Rob Fye vs Robert Kluemper / Robert Mazzeo3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesJerry Boley / James Lavoie vs Terry Womack / Robert Anglace6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2025-03-01vs Marion/James/55&Over7.0MWon 30
W#1 DoublesMonty Shelton / Michael Fullerton vs William Traylor / Blake Gall7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesMichael Tringali / Matthew Pirtle vs Brett Joyce / Eric Nickerson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesEric Osterchrist / Richard Hurley vs Chris Eversole / Michael James6-2, 7-5
2025-02-08vs Marion/James/55&Over7.0MLost 12
L#1 DoublesMonty Shelton / Michael Fullerton vs Terry Womack / Robert Mazzeo6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMartin McMahon / Rob Fye vs Robert Anglace / Blake Gall6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJames Lavoie / Jerry Boley vs Jim Clark / George Borlase2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult Men 55 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Matthew Pirtle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Michael Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.37
Eric Osterchrist
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Monty Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.10
Richard Hurley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Jerry Boley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
CARL TURNER
published 3
Martin McMahon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Michael Tringali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Miles Ridgway
published
Rob Fye
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Fullerton + Monty Shelton4265% gamesnot enough data
Richard Hurley + Eric Osterchrist4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Matthew Pirtle
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%70%30%
3.43
Michael Fullerton
52W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Eric Osterchrist
10W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%85%15%
3.37
Monty Shelton
9W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Richard Hurley
7W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.10
Jerry Boley
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
CARL TURNER
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Martin McMahon
4W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Michael Tringali
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Miles Ridgway
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Rob Fye
3W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.