Teams

Honey Badgers

2021 One Doubles · 2.5 Women

2 players · average NTRP / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-08-09vs One Love (Flexible)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Amy Friedland / Shelley Buhler5-7, 6-2, 0-1
2021-07-23vs Nora (Flexible)Won 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Tricia Nora / Corinne Crabs6-4, 6-3
2021-07-22vs AAALost 01
L#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Alison Etter / Amy Knobbs2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-14vs CourtantineWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Elizabeth Kardokus / Heather Thorne4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-18vs Double MintsWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Emily Apfel / Erin Mahony6-3, 6-3
2021-06-17vs AAAWon 10
W#1 DoublesMartha Draves / Wendy Laird vs Angie Holmstrom / Amy Knobbs7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Martha Draves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.35
Wendy Laird
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Laird + Martha Draves4256% games+1.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Martha Draves
28W–22L career · 6 lines in 2021
38%62%<1%
2.54
Wendy Laird
11W–35L career · 6 lines in 2021
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.