Teams

SPierle (Lifetime)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 3.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-25vs TYoung (Park Road)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCindi Helms / Ashley Bowles vs Christina Desai / Katherine Costello6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Maggie O'Neill6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesBrenda Sweeney / Cheri King vs Taylor Young / Catherine Becker2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Burks / Shannon Pierle vs Meghan Murphy / Kimberly Hoben3-6, 1-6
2025-04-24vs KWahr (Carmel)Won 31
L#1 DoublesPamela Burks / Shannon Pierle vs Kristine Wahr / Lauren Mulligan6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKim Wojnowich vs Amy Yancey7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBrenda Sweeney / Joelle Surprenant vs Tina Christensen / Molly Morris6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesLisa Pacello / Ashley Bowles vs Kim Walters / Murray Walker6-1, 6-0
2025-04-04vs MSchrimsher (Jeff Adams)Lost 13
L#1 DoublesCindi Helms / Julie Williams vs Amy Langdon / Tiffany Hurrell3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Louisa Jones6-0, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCheri King / Brenda Sweeney vs Jenny Merlo / Rebecca Klepser3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Canata / Erin Bloomberg vs Stuart Pfeifer / Amy Godwin5-7, 1-6
2025-03-28vs LAndersen/TRichardson (Chestnut)Won 40
W#1 DoublesCheri King / Christine Wade vs Becky Shopf / Loretta Anderson6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Dana Holloman6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKim Wojnowich / Lisa Pacello vs Sharon Storck / Allison Moseley7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJulie Williams / Erin Bloomberg vs Lori Andersen / Stephanie Gossert7-5, 1-6, 1-0
2025-03-21vs MKleber/LGrant (Queens)Split 22
W#1 DoublesChristine Wade / Brenda Sweeney vs Stephanie Meadow / Elizabeth Golden6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Marissa Kleber6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesPamela Burks / Joelle Surprenant vs Peggy Hoffman / Leslie Goldfarb6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLaurie Canata / Trista Holwager vs Laura Grant / Breck Lindley7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2025-03-14vs WJourdan (PPRSC)Split 22
L#1 DoublesPamela Burks / Joelle Surprenant vs Wendy Jourdan / Margaux Karagosian6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs Kathleen Johnstone6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesCindi Helms / Ashley Bowles vs Mary Eshleman / Ashley Emison6-2, 6-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesKim Wojnowich / Julie Williams vs Annie Christie / Tracy Jenkins6-4, 6-3
2025-03-07vs TDries/TOrmand (Raintree)Won 31
W#1 DoublesCheri King / Christine Wade vs Taylor Dries / Tanya Ormand4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#1 SinglesEmily Weigel vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLaurie Canata / Brenda Sweeney vs Meritt Schoening / Robin Caruso4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesCindi Helms / Ashley Bowles vs Suzanne Austin / Judith Skelton6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings28 teams · 40 & Over Adult 4.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1KEvans (OPRC)8024820226
2CMcWilliams/Wainscott (OPRC)7023514186
3TYoung (Park Road)7022618184
4CChildress (Jeff Adams)7123926231
5WYoung/JCugliari (BCC)71191329272
6TBasinger (Queens)6123518202
7MSchrimsher (Jeff Adams)6119919185
8MMerchant/EJohnston (Windyrush)62211128241
9SFloyd/O'Connor (OPRC)62201228241
10SPierle (Lifetime)52161228224
11MMcKeever/KHillard (Queens)52151329259
12LKachulis (WSRC)43161227228
13MKleber/LGrant (Queens)43171128253
14AMitchell/HPhelps (Bridgehampton)44191329261
15KBrannock (Weddington)44171536273
16TDries/TOrmand (Raintree)34141430238
17PDonoghue/NHaskins (Matthews)35131943309
18NFitzgerald/Wiethoff (Springfield)35112145308
19LCraig/LPage (Blakeney)25111739293
20AKinder (Weddington Chase)25101839297
21CJensen/CDelorenzo (Ballantyne)25101842284
22KCrosby (Sardis)26122045318
23BLeonnig (Hornets Nest)26102246311
24LAndersen/TRichardson (Chestnut)1642448289
25YGama (WSRC)1792348310
26DFerguson/OClaxton (Life Time)1792351341
27KWagner (OPRC)0752347305
28KWahr (Carmel)0742450321

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Emily Weigel
usually #1 Singles 82%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 4
3.89
Cheri King
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.83
Cindi Helms
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 10% · published 4
3.76
Ashley Bowles
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.74
Christine Wade
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.73
Shannon Pierle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Trista Holwager
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.60
Laurie Canata
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.57
Pamela Burks
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published
3.53
Brenda Sweeney
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.53
Erin Bloomberg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.48
Kim Wojnowich
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published 3.5
3.46
Lisa Pacello
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.28
Joelle Surprenant
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.20
Julie Williams
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Emily Weigel + Kim Wojnowich9462% games+10.2% vs expected
Cindi Helms + Julie Williams2448% games+7.5% vs expected
Cindi Helms + Erin Bloomberg11655% games+6.2% vs expected
Cindi Helms + Ashley Bowles4456% games+4.7% vs expected
Kim Wojnowich + Christine Wade3255% games+1.7% vs expected
Pamela Burks + Emily Weigel3349% games−0.1% vs expected
Laurie Canata + Trista Holwager5254% games−2.5% vs expected
Cindi Helms + Trista Holwager8748% games−4.7% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Weigel
163W–81L career · 11 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
4.01
4
Cheri King
85W–52L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.89
4
Cindi Helms
176W–142L career · 10 lines in 2025
1%90%10%
3.83
4
Ashley Bowles
26W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Wade
12W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.74
4
Shannon Pierle
208W–77L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Trista Holwager
81W–68L career · 1 line in 2025
12%88%<1%
3.65
Laurie Canata
81W–106L career · 3 lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.60
Pamela Burks
207W–133L career · 8 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
3.57
4
Brenda Sweeney
8W–11L career · 5 lines in 2025
40%60%<1%
3.53
3.5
Erin Bloomberg
164W–100L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.53
3.5
Kim Wojnowich
117W–52L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Lisa Pacello
87W–40L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
4
Joelle Surprenant
71W–103L career · 3 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
3.28
Julie Williams
52W–44L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.20

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.