Teams

Mike's 3.0W #1

2023 Adult 18 and Over League · 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MAUI

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-07-15vs Kicking AcesLost 13
L#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Val McKelvey vs Allison Kermode / Lisa Paulson1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesAngelica Almogela vs Rebecca Jakeway1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Colette Watanabe vs Rachael Barnard / Melanie Devereux4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMargaret Lawson / Bless Young vs Melissa Padillla / Lana Wilkinson6-7, 1-6
2023-07-08vs Tough StuffWon 50
W#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Kate Hamre vs Stephanie Boggs / Diane Ho6-0, 6-2
W#1 SinglesAngelica Almogela vs Laura Vo6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDanica Badua / Tricia Kezeli vs Elsie Crowninshield / Heidi Thorson6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAlexa Ballesteros vs Monika Jost6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Lawson / Bless Young vs Naomi Matsuura / Lisa Oyama6-4, 6-1
2023-07-02vs Kicking AcesWon 32
W#1 DoublesRosemary Bachaus / Kate Hamre vs Erin Haywood / Lisa Paulson6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesColette Watanabe vs Rebecca Jakeway1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAngelica Almogela / Danica Badua vs Jennifer Kelley / Lana Wilkinson3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 SinglesMaisie Knowles vs Stephanie Carlsen7-5, 6-1
L#3 DoublesChristiane Santoro / Bless Young vs Nicole Gonzales / Melissa Padillla6-7, 3-6
2023-06-18vs Kicking AcesWon 32
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lawson / Val McKelvey vs Rebecca Jakeway / Erin Haywood2-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesColette Watanabe vs Allison Kermode6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAngelica Almogela / Alexa Ballesteros vs Rachael Barnard / Christa Edwards4-6, 5-7
W#2 SinglesRosemary Bachaus vs Laurel Falit6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKate Hamre / Christiane Santoro vs Nicole Gonzales / Susan Fazekas6-2, 6-1
2023-06-13vs Tough StuffWon 40
W#1 DoublesMaisie Knowles / Margaret Lawson vs Elsie Crowninshield / Shirl Schumacher6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAngelica Almogela vs Jane Sakakihara5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDanica Badua / Alexa Ballesteros vs Naomi Matsuura / Corinne Tanabe6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesKate Hamre / Christiane Santoro vs Monika Jost / Lisa Oyama6-0, 6-0
2023-06-01vs Tough StuffWon 41
L#1 DoublesMargaret Lawson / Colette Watanabe vs Stephanie Boggs / Shirl Schumacher1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesMaisie Knowles vs Jane Sakakihara6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTricia Kezeli / Bless Young vs Heidi Thorson / Laura Vo6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAlexa Ballesteros vs Alicia Henry4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDanica Badua / Christiane Santoro vs Lisa Oyama / Corinne Tanabe6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 3.0 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mike's 3.0W #15122823216
2Kicking Aces42181225200
3Tough Stuff0632754331

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.55
Maisie Knowles
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.93
Tricia Kezeli
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Alexa Ballesteros
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Angelica Almogela
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
Bless Young
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Danica Badua
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.71
Colette Watanabe
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Christiane Santoro
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kate Hamre
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Margaret Lawson
published
Michael Kinoshita
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Rosemary Bachaus
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published
Val McKelvey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Rosemary Bachaus + Val McKelvey9453% games+6.4% vs expected
Bless Young + Tricia Kezeli123 matchesnot enough data
Rosemary Bachaus + Colette Watanabe213 matchesnot enough data
Val McKelvey + Maisie Knowles123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Maisie Knowles
55W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%36%64%
3.55
3
Tricia Kezeli
69W–98L career · 6 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
2.93
3
Alexa Ballesteros
9W–17L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Angelica Almogela
9W–15L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Bless Young
12W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Danica Badua
6W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Colette Watanabe
43W–53L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%1%
2.71
Christiane Santoro
3W–2L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Kate Hamre
19W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Margaret Lawson
7W–12L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Michael Kinoshita
30W–63L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rosemary Bachaus
55W–37L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Val McKelvey
25W–35L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.