Teams

LO Evergreens-Lynch

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Leslie Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.78
Kristi Vargas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Julie Hester
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Lisa West
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 0
Results6 ties
2021-08-07Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Leslie Lynch vs Carrie Fisher / Cheryl Roloff6-4, 6-2
2021-07-28Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKristi Vargas / Lisa West vs Erika Finrow / Kim Regalado4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-07-19Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLeslie Lynch / Lisa West vs Sarah Ferrer / Tarynn Berkman6-2, 6-2
2021-07-17Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa West / Leslie Lynch vs Christina Gilbert / Heather Dudley6-2, 6-3
2021-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa West / Leslie Lynch vs Darci Keljo / Nikki Metcalf6-3, 6-4
2021-06-23Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Hester / Kristi Vargas vs Flor Harrigan / Paula Petrica6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

4
Leslie Lynch
58W–58L career
0%97%3%
3.86
4
Kristi Vargas
82W–131L career
0%99%1%
3.78
4
Julie Hester
9W–25L career · type M
not enough data
0
Lisa West
26W–44L career
not enough data

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.