Greenwich Racquet Club
2024 18&Over Women Day Winter · 2.5 Day
15 players · average NTRP 2.88 / SOUTHERN REGION
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule8 played
i
Flight standings43 teams · 2.5 Day
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Westchester Country Club Vikings | 0 | 8 | 35 | 244 |
| 2Match Point: Rockland Racquettes | 0 | 8 | 40 | 250 |
| 3Club Fit Jefferson Valley | 0 | 9 | 19 | 211 |
| 4Clubfit Briarcliff Dare Doubles | 0 | 9 | 20 | 185 |
| 5Armonk Tennis Club: Whippoorwill | 0 | 9 | 20 | 208 |
| 6New Rochelle Racquet Club: Wonder Women | 0 | 9 | 23 | 189 |
| 7Chestnut Ridge: Ace Kickers | 0 | 9 | 24 | 217 |
| 8Armonk Indoor: Serves You Right | 0 | 9 | 29 | 241 |
| 9Life Time Emerald | 0 | 9 | 29 | 240 |
| 10Grand Slam Over Served | 0 | 9 | 35 | 263 |
| 11TIA: Deuces Wild | 0 | 9 | 37 | 268 |
| 12Hardscrabble Tempest | 0 | 9 | 37 | 263 |
| 13WTC: Wntr 3.0 WTC | 0 | 9 | 40 | 284 |
| 14Saw Mill 3.0 Smashers | 0 | 9 | 49 | 311 |
| 15WTC: Wntr 3.0 Ace Ace Baby | 0 | 10 | 13 | 152 |
| 16Sportime HI Armada UNITED | 0 | 10 | 14 | 170 |
| 17Sportime HI Hits & Giggles/Benedict | 0 | 10 | 15 | 213 |
| 18Rye Racquet: Love is Nothing | 0 | 10 | 16 | 192 |
| 19Greenwich Racquet Club | 0 | 10 | 19 | 218 |
| 20TIA: VOLLEY DOLLS | 0 | 10 | 21 | 189 |
| 21Sportime HI Hits & Giggles/Kline | 0 | 10 | 23 | 218 |
| 22TIA: Double Shots | 0 | 10 | 28 | 268 |
| 23Yonkers Tennis Center T's Misfit's | 0 | 10 | 29 | 250 |
| 24Maximum Tennis | 0 | 10 | 31 | 235 |
| 25Sportime Harbor Island: Grand Slams | 0 | 10 | 31 | 262 |
| 26Westchester Country Club: The Timberwolves | 0 | 10 | 31 | 264 |
| 27Life Time Sapphire | 0 | 10 | 31 | 261 |
| 28SLI: Pelham Forever Ins | 0 | 10 | 32 | 264 |
| 29RRC Dare Doubles | 0 | 10 | 34 | 279 |
| 30Yonkers Tennis Club Queens of the Court | 0 | 10 | 34 | 275 |
| 31New Rochelle Racquet Club: Unmatchables | 0 | 10 | 35 | 286 |
| 32TIA: Smart Aces | 0 | 10 | 36 | 288 |
| 33Sportime Lake Isle: Topspin Tigers | 0 | 10 | 36 | 282 |
| 34Sportime HI: Flint Park Village People | 0 | 10 | 36 | 269 |
| 35Armonk Tennis: Aces Wild | 0 | 10 | 39 | 281 |
| 36Sportime Harbor Island | 0 | 10 | 41 | 284 |
| 37Yonkers Tennis Center - Service With a Smile | 0 | 10 | 41 | 307 |
| 38Sportime HI Armada | 0 | 10 | 42 | 313 |
| 39Armonk Indoor: Deuces | 0 | 10 | 42 | 308 |
| 40Sportime Lake Isle | 0 | 10 | 45 | 315 |
| 41Grand Slam: Grandslammers 3.0 | 0 | 10 | 46 | 315 |
| 42Old Oaks- The strOAKS | 0 | 10 | 48 | 325 |
| 43TCH: Aces on Hudson | 0 | 10 | 50 | 334 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Marisa Yohay + ERICA COLTUN | 6–1 | 66% games | +11.6% vs expected |
| Dana Jack + Michelle Fisher | 17–5 | 66% games | +9.0% vs expected |
| Abby Finkel + Kerry Cox | 8–10 | 43% games | −0.7% vs expected |
| Abby Finkel + Samantha Kumar | 3–7 | 48% games | −1.1% vs expected |
| Ana Dean + Kerry Cox | 2–3 | 50% games | not enough data |
| Marisa Yohay + Sarah Kaufman | 1–3 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Stephanie Norton + Robyn Baldwin | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
| Elise Prebin + Robyn Baldwin | 1–2 | 3 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.