Teams

Hills - VanDyke Slice Girls/Farkas

2022 Hillsborough Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
W#1 DoublesJohnessa Hern / Sally Farkas vs Theresa Mays / Karen Cleland6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2022-05-23vs Westchase Winners - P. HayesWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Farkas / Andrea McKinney vs Melissa Bode / Nicole Tamulski6-1, 6-1
W#1 DoublesJohnessa Hern / Andrea Cottrell vs Anne Marie Lennox / Emelia Flitman6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSally Farkas / Frances Cooperwasser vs Jennifer Duglin / DIANA POSADA6-0, 6-1
2022-05-09vs Cheval - B. BurdetteWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Farkas / Andrea McKinney vs Brenda Burdette / Vera Trayner6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cottrell / Johnessa Hern vs Lisa Crow / Cheryl Bell6-0, 7-6
2022-05-02vs GH Slammers - L. BacardiWon 20
W#1 DoublesSally Farkas / Andrea McKinney vs Lourdes Bacardi / Carol Snyder6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cottrell / Johnessa Hern vs Jennifer Carlson / Denise Stone6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSally Farkas / Andrea McKinney vs Karen Cleland / Tricia Cardoso6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAndrea Cottrell / Johnessa Hern vs Carrie Bradley / Wendy Seybold6-0, 6-2
2022-04-18Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea Cottrell / Johnessa Hern vs Helen Reynolds / Jan Nelson6-1, 6-1
2022-04-11vs Arbor Greene - C. VanMeterWon 10
W#1 DoublesSally Farkas / Andrea McKinney vs Kelley Coffey / Celeste Kallenborn6-3, 6-1
2022-04-04Won 10
W#1 DoublesAndrea McKinney / Sally Farkas vs Anna Richardson / Melissa Bode6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 40 & Over Day- Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.01 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Andrea Cottrell
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.42
Sally Farkas
usually #1 Doubles 88%, also #3 Doubles 13% · published 3.5
3.22
Angie Focke
published 3.5
3.19
Andrea McKinney
published 3.5
2.92
Gina Lund
published 3
2.81
Angela Huber
published 3
2.59
Suzanne Huffman
published
2.55
Karen Sanford
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Farkas + Andrea Cottrell9461% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Andrea Cottrell
100W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Sally Farkas
159W–70L career · 8 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.42
3.5
Angie Focke
4W–6L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Andrea McKinney
3W–7L career · no lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.19
3
Gina Lund
15W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%72%28%
2.92
3
Angela Huber
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
2.81
Suzanne Huffman
9W–5L career · no lines in 2022
24%76%<1%
2.59
Karen Sanford
3W–3L career · no lines in 2022
36%64%<1%
2.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.