Teams

KRoberts-ENO

2025 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 2.90 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-24vs LBonzani-ENOWon 10
W#1 SinglesLizzy Burch vs Penny Kraft7-5, 6-2
2025-04-16vs SGraff-ENOLost 12
L#1 DoublesEmily Ryan / Cecilia Gonzales vs Mary T Long / Sara Lawrence4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLizzy Burch vs Beth Dingler2-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJennifer Huggins / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Kari Lovetinsky / Polly Hilsabeck2-6, 0-6
2025-04-09vs TCrowley-CHTCLost 02
L#1 DoublesLizzy Burch / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Gail Calloway / Ai-Jiuan Wu3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesBecki Cleveland vs Tracy Crowley6-7, 2-6
2025-04-02vs NDolan-HRLost 02
L#1 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Ellie Turner0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKristen Anderson / Becki Cleveland vs CLARE MURRAY / Eniko Nagy2-6, 4-6
2025-03-26vs TStefan-HSLost 01
L#3 DoublesJoan Clifford / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Melissa Provost / Kathy Holt0-6, 2-6
2025-03-15vs LGilchrist-CHCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesCecilia Gonzales / Leslie Dobkin vs Kristina Vrabel / Jennifer Woods0-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLizzy Burch vs Sarah Sapeta7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesBecki Cleveland / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Laura Porter / Laurie Rechholtz2-6, 1-6
2025-03-12vs JScaglione-EPHSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLizzy Burch / Camille Blommer vs Holly Guss / Rosa Laura Ortega Mora7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBecki Cleveland / Judith Hagopian-Edwards vs Onyi Dillibe / Johannah Maynor7-6, 6-2
2025-02-26vs KMcWhorter-HVCCSplit 11
L#1 SinglesCecilia Gonzales vs Cecily Peterson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesCamille Blommer / Becki Cleveland vs Kelly Jernigan / Sterling Ingui6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Lizzy Burch
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.86
Becki Cleveland
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.78
Camille Blommer
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.70
Cecilia Gonzales
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.60
Krissy Dunn
published
2.51
Kimberly Roberts
published
2.29
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 2.5
Joan Clifford
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lizzy Burch
44W–35L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3
Becki Cleveland
113W–108L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%84%16%
2.86
3
Camille Blommer
73W–74L career · 2 lines in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Cecilia Gonzales
49W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Krissy Dunn
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Kimberly Roberts
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%48%52%
2.51
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Joan Clifford
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.