Teams

F Woodlake 55 - Jolinski

2024 Richmond Adult 55 & Over Weekday Women · Richmond Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Weekday Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-07vs C Raintree Bullard - BryanLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Bavaro / Julia Morrison vs Jean Cheek / Amy Boschen4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-07-31vs A ACAC Parrish Double NickelsWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Giangregorio / Jeanean Phelps vs Daphne Cole / Margaret Peters6-1, 6-2
2024-07-17vs D Burkwood ThrockmortonWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Giangregorio / Jeanean Phelps vs Melissa Brock / Kimberley Dages6-4, 7-5
2024-07-10vs B Dominion Club SteinerLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Bavaro / Carolyn Wieder vs Nicole Tritaik / Robin Zachwieja3-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-07-03vs G Dean TeamWon 10
W#3 DoublesJeanean Phelps / Carolyn Wieder vs MaryAnn Cooley / Debbie Shea7-5, 6-2
2024-06-19vs C Raintree Bullard - BryanWon 20
W#1 DoublesLisa Giangregorio / Jeanean Phelps vs Helen Wang / Alexis Bullard6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSandra Bavaro / Sharon Shannon vs Elizabeth Pully / Holly Hathaway7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 55 & Over 6.0 Weekday Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Sharon Shannon
published
2.89
Jeanean Phelps
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.87
Virginia Patterson
published
2.86
Lisa Giangregorio
published
2.84
Sandra Bavaro
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.81
2.80
Allie Hannon
published 3
2.77
Julia Morrison
published
2.61
Wanda Huggins
published
2.52
Jenny Jolinski
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeanean Phelps + Sandra Bavaro151252% games+0.0% vs expected
Jenny Jolinski + Lisa Giangregorio134 matchesnot enough data
Jeanean Phelps + Sharon Shannon224 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Schneeberger + Virginia Patterson314 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Jolinski + Virginia Patterson213 matchesnot enough data
Rebecca Schneeberger + Wanda Huggins123 matchesnot enough data
Lisa Giangregorio + Sharon Shannon123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sharon Shannon
16W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Jeanean Phelps
145W–152L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
2.89
Virginia Patterson
20W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
2.87
Lisa Giangregorio
7W–16L career · no lines in 2024
84%16%<1%
2.86
Sandra Bavaro
128W–124L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%87%12%
2.84
Rebecca Schneeberger
10W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Allie Hannon
27W–39L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Julia Morrison
2W–5L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%5%
2.77
3
Barbara Patterson
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Wanda Huggins
6W–12L career · no lines in 2024
21%78%<1%
2.61
Jenny Jolinski
9W–21L career · no lines in 2024
44%56%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.