Teams

LA - Wonderwomen

2021 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2021-12-04vs LA - TennisacitySplit 11
W#1 DoublesKarin Chafetz / Audrey Plager vs Lori Andelson / Taniya Wilson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJady Vonderlieth / Shizuko Takayasu vs Alison King / Debra Nelson2-6, 2-6
2021-11-21vs LA - TennisacityLost 01
L#2 DoublesShizuko Takayasu / Jady Vonderlieth vs Latonya Bautista / Amie Nguyen7-6, 1-6, 0-1
2021-11-14vs LA - Network StarsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMisty Thomas / Shizuko Takayasu vs Annette Alling / Kim Grinberg6-7, 1-2
W#2 DoublesAnnelise Hansson / Audrey Plager vs Carol Ecker / Yvonne Branch6-7, 4-1, 1-0
2021-11-06vs LA - Network StarsLost 01
L#2 DoublesAudrey Plager / Annelise Hansson vs Annette Alling / Jessica Sykora2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2021-10-30vs LA - Kiss My AceLost 01
L#2 DoublesAnnelise Hansson / Audrey Plager vs Vilayvanh Shah / Sona Arutyunyan3-6, 4-6
2021-10-16vs LA-LLW-Queen Anne-Mala LeeLost 01
L#2 DoublesShizuko Takayasu / Judy Fazekas vs Margaret Gray / Tara Shultz0-6, 2-6
2021-10-03vs LA - Racquet ScientistsWon 10
W#3 DoublesAnnelise Hansson / Audrey Plager vs Lisa Assouad / Kristen Reut6-2, 6-3
2021-09-25Lost 01
L#3 DoublesShizuko Takayasu / Sandra Nervig vs Jenny Kastner / Anita Liu3-6, 4-6
2021-09-19vs LA - LATCLost 02
L#1 DoublesMisty Thomas / Shizuko Takayasu vs Nilou Panahpour / Jenny Ratkovich1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAudrey Plager / Annelise Hansson vs Susan Kneafsey / Michele Weiss4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Audrey Plager
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.45
Shizuko Takayasu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Debra Holstein
published 3.5
Heidi Gibbs
published 3.5
3.13
Karen Barry
published
2.82
Jady Vonderlieth
published 3
Karin Chafetz
published
Linda Layton
published
Sandra Nervig
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Audrey Plager
9W–10L career · 6 lines in 2021
31%69%<1%
3.56
3.5
Shizuko Takayasu
129W–141L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%65%35%
3.45
3.5
Debra Holstein
0W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Heidi Gibbs
0W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Barry
2W–3L career · no lines in 2021
16%83%<1%
3.13
3
Jady Vonderlieth
7W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%9%
2.82
Karin Chafetz
2W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Linda Layton
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandra Nervig
3W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.