Teams

Martin

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over-Knoxville · 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.33 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule12 played
2025-03-01vs Williams/KnoxvilleLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmanda Mize / Ann Brady vs Victoria Sissom / Lauren Hall1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLori DeRoos / Stacey Wright vs Abigail Jumper / Liz Mcclain1-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesGinger Arthur / LeighAnn Carlton vs Katie Buehler / Amber McGhee1-6, 0-6
2025-02-28vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Mubarak / Tracey Belmont vs Patsy Fischer / Isabel Cunningham6-7, 1-6
2025-02-14vs HendersonWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Blackwood / Jen Rose vs Carly OConnor / Anna Kizer6-1, 7-6
2025-02-08vs GomesDouglasLost 03
L#1 DoublesLori DeRoos / Nicole White vs Laura Wolfe / Cameron Beedle3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesStacey Wright / Ann Brady vs Emily Elison / Allison King2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLeighAnn Carlton / Libby Hicks vs Jenna Gomes / Sarah Michalik2-6, 0-6
2025-02-02vs Dabbs/KnoxvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesLeah Sullivan / Tracey Belmont vs Lauren Huston / Tracy Collins3-6, 2-6
2025-02-01vs Hayes/MauteWon 30
W#1 DoublesSantana Ewers / Lisa Perkey vs Emily Jenkins / Paige Brown7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesTracey Belmont / Kimberly Nelson vs Ali Dunnavant Edwards / Nikki Tilson6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJen Rose / Ginger Arthur vs Ashtyn Wright / Heather Ridenour7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-31vs McElrathSarratLost 01
L#1 DoublesTracey Belmont / Kimberly Nelson vs Tabitha McElrath / Stacy Carter1-6, 3-6
2025-01-31vs Yoder/KnoxvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesAmanda Blackwood / Jen Rose vs Shelly Krummen / Keri Root7-5, 6-0
2025-01-25vs Williams/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesNicole White / Lisa Perkey vs Victoria Sissom / Lauren Hall3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesAmanda Martin / Lori DeRoos vs Abigail Jumper / Amy Saty4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLeighAnn Carlton / Libby Hicks vs Lynsey Anderson / Amber McGhee6-7, 0-6
2025-01-18vs Unger/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesSantana Ewers / Lisa Perkey vs Cameron Beedle / HAILEY NEDS7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAnn Brady / Stacey Wright vs Emily Elison / Emily Mcclenagan2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJen Rose / Anna Taylor vs Laura Brumit / Imke Burfeind6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-01-17vs McKeehanLost 01
L#2 DoublesJen Rose / Heather Wilson vs Cassidy Hawkins / Sarah Olesiuk1-6, 3-6
2025-01-12vs Hayes/MauteWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnna Taylor / Libby Hicks vs Jessie Hall / Ashtyn Wright2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesTracey Belmont / Kimberly Nelson vs Ali Dunnavant Edwards / Nikki Tilson7-5, 6-4
W#3 DoublesNicole White / Tammy Simpson vs Jennifer Oakley / Tori Hayes6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0,3.5,3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.10 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Santana Ewers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Lisa Perkey
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Tammy Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Lori DeRoos
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.17
Tracey Belmont
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.12
Amanda Mize
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Stacey Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Ann Brady
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.84
Ginger Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Jen Rose
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.43
Libby Hicks
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.32
LeighAnn Carlton
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Arthur + Jen Rose9456% games+6.1% vs expected
Lisa Perkey + Santana Ewers7359% games−0.0% vs expected
Amanda Mize + Ann Brady224 matchesnot enough data
LeighAnn Carlton + Libby Hicks123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Santana Ewers
26W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.96
Lisa Perkey
64W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.84
Tammy Simpson
36W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
51%49%<1%
3.50
Lori DeRoos
31W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
3.39
Tracey Belmont
22W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Amanda Mize
16W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Stacey Wright
9W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
44%55%<1%
3.02
3.5
Ann Brady
8W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
3.01
3
Ginger Arthur
42W–39L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Jen Rose
50W–36L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Libby Hicks
7W–30L career · 3 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.43
LeighAnn Carlton
10W–19L career · 3 lines in 2025
91%9%<1%
2.32

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.