Teams

MLF

2021 CTA TWILIGHT - NOCO · MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO

8 players · average NTRP 3.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2021-09-16vs LVTA REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoe Ashbee / Michael Robeson vs Jared Petersen / Brian Smith2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Babcock / Nicola Demacopoulos vs Dennis Flanigan / Brian Petersen3-6, 6-1, 0-1
2021-08-28vs LTSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJoe Ashbee / Peter Marinescu vs Kim Bender / Michael Bird6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNicola Demacopoulos / Eric Jones vs Mark Sundstedt / Federico Pardina2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-08-24vs FCCCLost 02
L#1 DoublesNicola Demacopoulos / Eric Jones vs Josh Shelby / Christopher Serbousek7-6, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKeith Babcock / Joe Ashbee vs Paul Gronewoller / John Stout7-6, 6-7, 0-1
2021-08-17vs LVTA BLUEWon 10
W#1 DoublesPeter Marinescu / Joe Ashbee vs Cory Lynch / Greg Jette6-4, 6-3
2021-08-10vs LTLost 01
L#2 DoublesNicola Demacopoulos / Keith Babcock vs Mark Sundstedt / Jim Kelly6-7, 2-6
2021-07-27vs LVTA REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesJoe Ashbee / David Trevino vs Jared Petersen / Brian Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKeith Babcock / Nicola Demacopoulos vs Mark Flanigan / Dennis Flanigan6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 4.0 - TWILIGHT - NOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
David Trevino
published 4
3.72
Jeremy Johnson
published
3.54
Joe Ashbee
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.10
Nicola Demacopoulos
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Jeff Brauch
published
Keith Babcock
published
Michael Robeson
published
Peter Marinescu
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Trevino + Joe Ashbee044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Trevino
20W–21L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
Jeremy Johnson
21W–12L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Joe Ashbee
81W–50L career · 5 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
3.54
3.5
Nicola Demacopoulos
14W–71L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%78%<1%
3.10
Jeff Brauch
12W–10L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Keith Babcock
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Michael Robeson
28W–11L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Peter Marinescu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.