Teams

Hills/Burkhart/65&Over7.0M

2024 Hillsborough Adult 65 & Over · 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-10-19Won 10
W#2 DoublesRobert Chen / James Whitaker vs Terry Lamphier / Albert Martini6-2, 6-0
2024-10-01vs Temple Terrace - R. WarrenerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRick Burkhart / Robert Chen vs Samuel Rosenbleeth / Brian Westmoreland4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesDaniel Shields / Lawrence Palombo vs Patrick Rairigh / Richard Warrener6-3, 6-3
2024-09-24vs Temple Terrace - R. WarrenerSplit 11
L#1 DoublesRobert Chen / Toi Phan vs George Hawkins / Terry Lamphier4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesDaniel Shields / Lawrence Palombo vs Richard Warrener / Brian Westmoreland7-5, 6-4
2024-09-17vs Temple Terrace - R. WarrenerSplit 11
L#2 DoublesRobert Chen / Richard J Derr vs George Hawkins / Samuel Rosenbleeth6-7, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLawrence Palombo / Daniel Shields vs Albert Martini / Brian Westmoreland6-2, 6-3
2024-09-10vs Temple Terrace - R. WarrenerWon 10
W#3 DoublesLawrence Palombo / Daniel Shields vs Samuel Rosenbleeth / George Hawkins2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2024-09-03vs Temple Terrace - R. WarrenerWon 10
W#3 DoublesLawrence Palombo / Daniel Shields vs Brian Westmoreland / Terry Lamphier7-6, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 Adult 65 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.25 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.46
Max R Francois
published
3.41
Daniel Shields
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Robert Chen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.12
Lawrence Palombo
published
3.08
Rick Burkhart
published
James Whitaker
published
Richard J Derr
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Chen + Max R Francois224 matchesnot enough data
Lawrence Palombo + Rick Burkhart123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Max R Francois
14W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.46
3.5
Daniel Shields
32W–43L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%74%25%
3.41
3.5
Robert Chen
158W–87L career · 4 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Lawrence Palombo
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
Rick Burkhart
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.08
James Whitaker
4W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard J Derr
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.