Teams

Pa.Weis55M

2024 Capital Mixed 55 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.36 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-07-29vs Ca.Conzola55MWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Jeffery Troch vs Kelly Johnson / Robert Chandler6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKen Dehaven / Ann Hahn vs Charles Pleasants / Takako Schenberger6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPam Weis / John van Campen vs Camille Conzola / Scott Zargo6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2024-07-16vs Sh.Lav55MLost 12
W#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Ken Dehaven vs Tracey Carlin / Christopher Bricker6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLisa K Austin / Jeffery Troch vs Nancy Gugliotta / Philip Gugliotta3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesShannon Parham / John Parham vs Susan Hembarsky / Eric Moritz1-6, 1-6
2024-07-09vs Jo.Nance55M3.5Won 20
W#1 DoublesLinda Carroll / Ken Dehaven vs Jocelyn Badulis / James Vandenbossche6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLisa K Austin / John van Campen vs Jennifer Silverberg / Joel Nance6-2, 6-4
2024-07-02vs Lo.Hatlen55MLost 02
L#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Jeffery Troch vs Lori Hatlen / Roger Hatlen1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesJohn van Campen / Ann Hahn vs Edward Poyo / Susana Harvey3-6, 1-6
2024-06-25vs Ch.Subasic55MSplit 11
W#2 DoublesLisa K Austin / John Parham vs Julie Sauls / Kevin Duffy6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesPam Weis / Randall Harrill vs Jamie Kerzner / Michael Kerzner1-6, 1-6
2024-06-18vs Ca.Zimmerman55MWon 20
W#1 DoublesJennifer Troch / Jeffery Troch vs Joy Millikan / Todd Blevins6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLinda Carroll / Ken Dehaven vs April Lyon / Tim Lyon6-2, 6-4
2024-06-13vs Ca.Conzola55MLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeffery Troch / Ann Hahn vs Robert Chandler / Kelly Johnson2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesJohn van Campen / Lisa K Austin vs Scott Zargo / Kelly Zargo4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJohn Parham / Shannon Parham vs Charles Pleasants / Carolyn Elliott3-6, 4-6
2024-05-28vs Sh.Lav55MLost 02
L#2 DoublesJennifer Troch / Randall Harrill vs Daphne Driscoll / Chun Lav4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesPam Weis / Ken Dehaven vs Nancy Gugliotta / Philip Gugliotta2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Ken Dehaven
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.38
John van Campen
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.32
John Parham
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Jeffery Troch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.27
Linda Carroll
published
3.20
Jennifer Troch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.18
Randall Harrill
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.16
John Richardson
published
2.80
Pam Weis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Ann Hahn
published 3
2.59
Shannon Parham
published
Lisa K Austin
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jeffery Troch + Jennifer Troch81049% games−3.7% vs expected
Jennifer Troch + Ken Dehaven5356% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Troch + John van Campen3254% gamesnot enough data
Randall Harrill + Jennifer Troch123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ken Dehaven
94W–89L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%48%52%
3.51
3.5
John van Campen
144W–171L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%79%20%
3.38
John Parham
57W–60L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Jeffery Troch
84W–65L career · 5 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.30
Linda Carroll
3W–0L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Jennifer Troch
155W–100L career · 5 lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.20
3.5
Randall Harrill
18W–40L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
John Richardson
4W–6L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.16
3
Pam Weis
30W–55L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
3
Ann Hahn
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Shannon Parham
2W–9L career · no lines in 2024
25%74%<1%
2.59
Lisa K Austin
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.