Teams

UPTA18C/Foster/Hwy14

2025 UPTA Combo 18 & Over - SC · 18+ Combo Women - 6.5

17 players · average NTRP 3.33 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-26vs UPTA18C/Murillo-Rood/CardinalLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Catherine Boetsch vs Carol Cohron / Stephanie Harrelson7-5, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBeth Ouellette / Ashley Brown vs Britanny A ROOD / Gina Pelino5-7, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Krason / JB Robinson vs Kellar Rogers / Valerie Mattingly7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2025-08-22vs UPTA18C/McGrath/ThornbladeLost 12
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Malcolm / Katie Saad vs Brantley Goforth / Laura Garrett6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDell Pulliam / Kathryn Means vs Jill Seeley / Keri McGrath1-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#3 DoublesHope Moriarty / Deb Dujardin vs Erin Byxbee / Kelly Wheeler6-2, 2-6, 0-1
2025-08-19vs UPTA18C/Spivey/Holly TreeWon 30
W#1 DoublesLaura Fee / Ashley Brown vs Jodi Hudgins / Lora Henderson7-5, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKatie Saad / Catie Kelley vs Shelly James / Michelle Weston6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesStacey Thomas / Patricia Surles vs Haley Reynolds / Erica Ritter6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Combo Women - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 16 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Elizabeth Malcolm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.46
Dell Pulliam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Catherine Boetsch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.35
Kathryn Means
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Patricia Surles
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.25
Jacque Foster
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Deb Dujardin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Jane Krason
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Beth Ouellette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Hope Moriarty
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Anne Taaffe
published 3
3.03
JB Robinson
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.02
Katie Saad
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Catie Kelley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Laura Fee
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Lindsey New
published
Jamie Miller
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

JB Robinson + Deb Dujardin7170% games+11.5% vs expected
Kathryn Means + Catherine Boetsch16562% games+9.8% vs expected
Laura Fee + Dell Pulliam9756% games+7.3% vs expected
Deb Dujardin + Dell Pulliam24863% games+0.8% vs expected
Deb Dujardin + Laura Fee3549% games−6.4% vs expected
Beth Ouellette + Jane Krason314 matchesnot enough data
Lindsey New + Dell Pulliam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Malcolm
57W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
3.5
Dell Pulliam
45W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%61%39%
3.46
3.5
Catherine Boetsch
31W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%83%16%
3.36
Kathryn Means
43W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.35
Patricia Surles
62W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.25
Jacque Foster
32W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Deb Dujardin
48W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.19
Jane Krason
24W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
3.5
Beth Ouellette
25W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.12
Hope Moriarty
29W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.07
3
Anne Taaffe
22W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
JB Robinson
49W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.03
Katie Saad
22W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Catie Kelley
24W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
Laura Fee
35W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.90
Lindsey New
29W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.89
Jamie Miller
9W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.