Teams

WC BLUE

2023 CTA WOMEN'S SUMMER DAYTIME - DEN · WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-08-09vs HRCA-N BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesCC Dick / Emily Lewis vs Laurien Hottman / Kristen Swenson2-6
2023-08-02vs GAC ORANGELost 01
L#2 DoublesCC Dick / Kathryn Cullen vs Laney Abrahamson / Sarah Younggren3-6, 5-7
2023-07-26vs HW GREENLost 01
L#1 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / Kirsten Mau vs Tiffanie Lenderman / Vivian Perla1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-07-19vs LEBTC GREENLost 01
L#1 SinglesCC Dick vs Kelly Callister4-6, 4-6
2023-07-12vs LTFC PINKSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathryn Cullen / CC Dick vs Judy Mickelson / Kim Lyons6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesKirsten Mau vs Charity Aslin0-6, 2-6
2023-06-28vs KC-RH NAVYWon 20
W#1 DoublesMaryBeth Doerr / CC Dick vs Jean Dixon / Suzy Farrell4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTina Burton / Kirsten Mau vs DeAnne Smith / Linda Head1-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - SUMMER DAYTIME have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.27
Emily Lewis
published
Becca Rinn
published 3.5
3.04
Kathryn Cullen
published
2.96
Juli Simmermon
published 3.5
2.94
Tina Burton
published
2.83
Kirsten Mau
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.69
CC Dick
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.67
MaryBeth Doerr
published
2.64
Taryn Wilson
published
2.50
Laura Ream
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kirsten Mau + Tina Burton10263% games+3.9% vs expected
CC Dick + Juli Simmermon1838% games−0.5% vs expected
Juli Simmermon + Emily Lewis3546% games−7.1% vs expected
Becca Rinn + Emily Lewis314 matchesnot enough data
CC Dick + Becca Rinn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Emily Lewis
15W–15L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Becca Rinn
9W–6L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Kathryn Cullen
33W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.04
3.5
Juli Simmermon
15W–49L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Tina Burton
39W–14L career · no lines in 2023
<1%68%32%
2.94
3
Kirsten Mau
89W–62L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
2.83
3
CC Dick
59W–72L career · 5 lines in 2023
9%90%1%
2.69
MaryBeth Doerr
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
11%88%1%
2.67
Taryn Wilson
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
Laura Ream
9W–25L career · no lines in 2023
50%50%<1%
2.50

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.