Teams

LParker/JB/JCC

2025 Adult 40 & Over Spring league 2.5-4.0 · 2.5 Women

6 players · average NTRP 2.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-14vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APWon 21
L#1 DoublesCaroline Wilson / Janeene Lynch vs Molly Goodart / Jamie Chandler1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesRenee Cobern vs Kristie Becker6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTera Harpole / Kimberly Moseley vs Holly Robertson / Danae Sandusky6-0, 7-6
2025-04-11vs Myers/JB/RPCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTera Harpole / Caroline Wilson vs Tiffany Floyd / Amy Gibson6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJune Long / Janeene Lynch vs Tara Smith / Michele Reba2-6, 1-6
2025-04-10vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Parker / Janeene Lynch vs Donna Jones / Fen Yu6-2, 6-0
L#1 SinglesTera Harpole vs Jamie Chandler3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJune Long / Kimberly Moseley vs Molly Goodart / Danae Sandusky2-6, 3-6
2025-04-01vs Myers/JB/RPCCLost 12
W#1 DoublesLauren Parker / Janeene Lynch vs Brandy Johnston / Christy Wortham6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesTera Harpole vs Tiffany Floyd6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJune Long / Caroline Wilson vs Michele Reba / Tara Smith1-6, 2-6
2025-03-31vs Goodart-Sandusky/JB/APLost 02
L#1 DoublesTera Harpole / Caroline Wilson vs Molly Goodart / Jamie Chandler1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Cobern / Kimberly Moseley vs Donna Jones / Holly Robertson6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-09vs Myers/JB/RPCCLost 12
L#1 DoublesKimberly Moseley / Janeene Lynch vs Gloria Faircloth / Tiffany Floyd0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Wilson vs Michelle Myers6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesRenee Cobern / June Long vs Brandy Johnston / Lori Smith6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.38
Renee Cobern
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.35
Tera Harpole
usually #1 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
2.26
Caroline Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 2.5
2.19
June Long
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janeene Lynch
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kimberly Moseley
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Wilson + Tera Harpole1438% games−5.5% vs expected
Tera Harpole + Renee Cobern044 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Wilson + Renee Cobern123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Renee Cobern
19W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Tera Harpole
24W–24L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%85%15%
2.35
2.5
Caroline Wilson
12W–28L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%95%5%
2.26
June Long
9W–16L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.19
Janeene Lynch
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kimberly Moseley
1W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.