Teams

LA - Triforces

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Men 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-11-11vs LA - MulhollandWon 10
W#3 DoublesDarren Earl / Fangrui Chen vs Kamall Shaikh / Eric Salat6-2, 6-1
2024-11-10vs LA - Bring Your BestWon 10
W#1 DoublesJonathan Talbot / Darren Earl vs Joshua Luo / Aditya Agarkar7-5, 6-4
2024-11-02vs LA - Ace DragonWon 10
W#1 DoublesDarren Earl / Jonathan Talbot vs Greg Abramson / Adam Winkler4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-10-27vs LA - Social PariahsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRoger Wang / Darren Earl vs Ralph Nunley / Eric Geiger6-7, 0-6
2024-09-28vs LA-LLW-Good Vibrations-James HartWon 10
W#1 DoublesRoger Wang / Darren Earl vs Oscar Contesini / Mark McColgan2-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-09-22vs LA - Queen Anne 4.0MLost 01
L#1 DoublesFangrui Chen / Darren Earl vs Aaron Nepomuceno / Daniel Litvin0-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.64 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Jonathan Talbot
published
3.79
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.70
Roger Wang
published
3.69
Fangrui Chen
published
3.59
Darren Earl
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Trenman Yau
published
3.59
Sergio Ibarra
published
3.53
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
published
3.46
Michael Vasquez
published
Paul de Lumen
published
Thinh Do
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sergio Ibarra + Trenman Yau303 matchesnot enough data
Richard Ortiz-Reyes + Miguel Ortiz-Reyes303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jonathan Talbot
5W–7L career · no lines in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Richard Ortiz-Reyes
25W–9L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Roger Wang
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%2%
3.70
Fangrui Chen
8W–5L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
4
Darren Earl
108W–148L career · 6 lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
3.59
Trenman Yau
11W–6L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Sergio Ibarra
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
3.59
Miguel Ortiz-Reyes
29W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.53
Michael Vasquez
10W–10L career · no lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Paul de Lumen
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Thinh Do
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.