Teams

LLPA-Pate/NMP

2024 Lake Combo Doubles 18 & Over · Women 7.5

10 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-10-10vs LKGO-Goodnough/WestportLost 03
L#1 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Cindy Houser vs Jennie Carruth / Diane Davis1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesGreigh Lucas / Lane Wallace vs Shaun Simmer / Katelyn Goodnough4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Julie Finke vs Christy Bolick / Coleen Foye4-6, 3-6
2024-10-03vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 7.5Won 21
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Lane Wallace vs Kelly Lesso / Kathleen Navola6-7, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesApril Cook / Cindy Houser vs Noreen Soos / Susan Lesso6-1, 7-6
W#3 DoublesPatty Smith / Emily Heinemann Hamilton vs Katherine Dugan / Nathalie Naslund4-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-09-19vs LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKatie McCrossen / Kathryn Burdick vs Rebecca Karner / Bridgett Dedmond4-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesJulie Finke / Cindy Houser vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-09-03vs LKGO-Goodnough/WestportSplit 11
L#1 DoublesPatty Smith / Cindy Houser vs Diane Davis / Angela Stallman4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKatie McCrossen / Emily Heinemann Hamilton vs Melinda Urban / Christy Bolick0-6, 6-4, 1-0
2024-08-29vs LABO-Bonham/NMP 18+ 7.5Won 21
W#1 DoublesGreigh Lucas / Lane Wallace vs Beth McCarthy / Kelly Lesso6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJulie Finke / Patty Smith vs Maria Emilia de la Orden / Cindy Japec0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Kathryn Burdick vs Ellyn Pavelka / Noreen Soos7-6, 6-2
2024-08-22vs LCGR-Griffin/Jetton 7.5 18+Lost 02
L#2 DoublesLane Wallace / Greigh Lucas vs Samantha Humphreys / Kelly Hallman3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Higgins / Abbi Troutman vs Cortney Griffin / Mary Parker1-6, 0-6
2024-08-15vs LNKA-Kayton-Robinson/WestportLost 12
L#1 DoublesSuzanne Davis / Julie Finke vs Bridgett Dedmond / Rebecca Karner6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesElizabeth Born / Greigh Lucas vs Sunny Donoghue / Katherine Trask5-7, 5-7
W#3 DoublesEmily Heinemann Hamilton / Patty Smith vs Mali Robinson / Astrid Peterson6-2, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.87
Emily Heinemann Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.72
Lane Wallace
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.65
Jennifer Higgins
published
3.64
Greigh Lucas
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.47
Julie Finke
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.38
LuAnne Pate
published
3.36
Katie McCrossen
published
3.23
Cindy Houser
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.20
Abbi Troutman
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Kathryn Burdick
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kathryn Burdick + Julie Finke61250% games−4.9% vs expected
Kathryn Burdick + Cindy Houser2447% gamesnot enough data
Greigh Lucas + Lane Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Emily Heinemann Hamilton
86W–38L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%84%16%
3.87
4
Lane Wallace
61W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.72
Jennifer Higgins
28W–23L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%<1%
3.65
4
Greigh Lucas
77W–75L career · 4 lines in 2024
15%85%<1%
3.64
3.5
Julie Finke
122W–96L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%60%40%
3.47
LuAnne Pate
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.38
Katie McCrossen
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Cindy Houser
73W–56L career · 4 lines in 2024
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Abbi Troutman
26W–50L career · 5 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Kathryn Burdick
115W–162L career · 5 lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.