Teams

SSikes

2022 Capital Combo 40 & Over · 5.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-10-11vs CByrum 5.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesSally Sikes / Mary Strothmann vs Sara Mazurak / Lora Barnett1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-10-04vs AJones 40+ 5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesVanessa Fleischmann / Mary Strothmann vs Vanese Clough / Cara Pierce6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-20vs APershkeLost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Kathryn Williamson vs Misty Howell / Catie Cunningham6-7, 7-6, 0-1
2022-09-13vs JWOLBORSKY 5.5 COMBO FALLWon 10
W#3 DoublesMary Strothmann / Kathryn Williamson vs Bladen Leippe / Jill Rhim6-2, 6-2
2022-09-06Lost 01
L#1 DoublesPriscilla Nanney / Christine Rosin vs Chris Lickey / Lori Harrelson3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-08-23vs CByrum 5.5Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSally Sikes / Priscilla Nanney vs Sara Mazurak / Tracy Wild1-6, 1-6
2022-08-16vs AJones 40+ 5.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMary Strothmann / Christine Rosin vs Linda Blevins / Olga Stephens2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 5.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.96
Mary Strothmann
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.84
Judy Colby
published
2.63
Christine Rosin
published 3
2.55
Priscilla Nanney
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.50
Lavonne Moore
published
2.44
Lynn Longest
published
2.43
Susan Lavrack
published
2.42
Sally Sikes
published
2.36
Kathryn Williamson
published
Jane Diepenbrock
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Priscilla Nanney + Mary Strothmann121847% games−2.0% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Mary Strothmann
111W–114L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
2.96
Judy Colby
7W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%88%11%
2.84
3
Christine Rosin
6W–15L career · no lines in 2022
16%84%<1%
2.63
3
Priscilla Nanney
41W–122L career · 3 lines in 2022
35%65%<1%
2.55
Lavonne Moore
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
Lynn Longest
2W–11L career · no lines in 2022
68%32%<1%
2.44
Susan Lavrack
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
70%30%<1%
2.43
Sally Sikes
1W–10L career · no lines in 2022
73%27%<1%
2.42
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
86%14%<1%
2.36
Jane Diepenbrock
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.