Teams

Reel IHCC

2023 Tuscaloosa USTA Tri-Level Weekday 18&over · Women 3.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.62 / ALABAMA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Anna Kniphfer
published 4
3.98
Beth English
published 4.5
3.87
Dorie Edwards
published
3.54
Sally Reel
published
3.29
Wendy Buchheit
published
3.19
Leigh Summerlin
published
3.01
Rebecca Patterson
published
2.42
Libby Patton
published
2.30
Blakely Blakeney
published 3
2.27
Frances Pruett
published
Bailey Chambers
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Frances Pruett + Blakely Blakeney303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anna Kniphfer
8W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
4.01
4.5
Beth English
11W–4L career · no lines in 2023
55%45%<1%
3.98
Dorie Edwards
8W–1L career · no lines in 2023
<1%<1%>99%
3.87
Sally Reel
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%38%62%
3.54
Wendy Buchheit
10W–17L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.29
Leigh Summerlin
5W–3L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.19
Rebecca Patterson
12W–10L career · no lines in 2023
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Caroline Williams
3W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Libby Patton
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
0%71%29%
2.42
3
Blakely Blakeney
9W–10L career · no lines in 2023
93%7%<1%
2.30
Frances Pruett
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
0%95%5%
2.27
Bailey Chambers
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Madelene Hollingsworth
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.