Teams

Burrito Machine

2025 FLEX DYNAMIC DUO · Men 3.0

3 players · average NTRP 3.00 / IDAHO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-10-06vs Net Ninja'sSplit 11
L#1 SinglesMatthew Rubio vs Matthew Nelson4-6
W#2 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Ryan Hales6-3
2025-09-24vs Backhand and Lobbin'Split 11
W#1 SinglesMatthew Rubio vs Tony Auston6-3
L#2 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Patrik Martinet4-6
2025-09-23vs Ball BrawlWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Rubio vs Matt Knollenberg6-0
W#2 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Thomas Wiley6-1
2025-09-22vs SLIM shadyWon 10
W#1 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Stuart Miyasako6-1
2025-09-08vs Backhand and Lobbin'Lost 01
L#2 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Tony Auston2-6
2025-08-16vs Army/air4ceWon 20
W#1 SinglesMatthew Rubio vs Allen Niksich6-1
W#2 SinglesChris Angermayer vs Chris Dubose7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · Men 3.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Backhand and Lobbin'62168891
2SLIM shady42135552
3Net Ninja's3063330
4Burrito Machine2499972
5Army/air4ce154141497
6Ball Brawl0309954

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.89 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Matthew Rubio
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
Greg Kreller
published 3
2.66
Chris Angermayer
usually #2 Singles 83%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chris Angermayer + Matthew Rubio2737% games−0.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Matthew Rubio
78W–79L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.13
3
Greg Kreller
12W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chris Angermayer
53W–73L career · 6 lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.