Teams

MARIN TC 40MX9.0A

2025 MIXED 40&Over · 40&Over MX9.0

29 players · average NTRP 4.38 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 40&Over MX9.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.03 estimated across 28 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.41
Kristin Morrell
published
4.37
Michelle Kohm
published
4.31
Jennifer Mills
published
4.30
4.28
Kevin Erickson
published
4.27
4.25
Elizabeth Shalev
published 4.5
4.24
Christopher Brawer
published 4.5
4.20
Melanie Beardslee
published
4.18
David Erlich
published 4.5
4.17
James Brandt
published 4.5
4.09
Kristen Nicita
published
4.08
Sugi Bernard
published
4.04
Michael Myette
published
3.98
Emily Bell
published 4
3.98
William Dagley
published
3.98
Kushal Chakrabarty
published
3.96
Amy See
published 4.5
3.91
3.88
Nicole Bianchi
published
3.82
Lisa Eastlack
published
3.81
Carnet Williams
published 4
3.78
Robert Ahearn
published
3.77
Jeffery Birkenseer
published
3.75
Kris Hinckley
published
3.71
Michael Graziano
published
3.67
Jason Holmes
published
3.62
Thomas Chang
published
T Eric Lehto
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Morrell
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
4.41
Michelle Kohm
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
4.37
Jennifer Mills
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
4.31
Kimberly Borah-Schulist
9W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
4.30
Kevin Erickson
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%94%5%
4.28
4.5
Christine Costamagna
10W–4L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Elizabeth Shalev
13W–4L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Christopher Brawer
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%94%2%
4.24
Melanie Beardslee
9W–11L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.20
4.5
David Erlich
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
9%91%1%
4.18
4.5
James Brandt
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
10%90%1%
4.17
Kristen Nicita
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
4.09
Sugi Bernard
20W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%27%73%
4.08
Michael Myette
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
39%61%<1%
4.04
4
Emily Bell
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.98
William Dagley
2W–9L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
Kushal Chakrabarty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
3.98
4.5
Amy See
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Michael Lustenberger
18W–20L career · no lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
3.91
Nicole Bianchi
8W–10L career · no lines in 2025
83%17%<1%
3.88
Lisa Eastlack
38W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Carnet Williams
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.81
Robert Ahearn
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.78
Jeffery Birkenseer
7W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.77
Kris Hinckley
13W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
3.75
Michael Graziano
21W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%1%
3.71
Jason Holmes
17W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
Thomas Chang
9W–7L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
3.62
T Eric Lehto
4W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.