Teams

Gowen

2022 Anne Arundel Tri-Level 18 & Over · Anne Arundel Tri-Level 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-12-04vs GibbsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammi Molavi / Alexandria Arnold vs Tina Rohm / Stephanie Riley1-6, 2-6
2022-11-27vs LewandowskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesTammi Molavi / Sadie Simpson vs Caroline Hunolt / Laura Lewandowski4-6, 3-6
2022-11-20vs Orange SmashWon 10
W#1 DoublesSue King / Yngrid Sierra vs Holly Hill / Carol Dress6-3, 5-7, 1-0
2022-11-05vs LewandowskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Jennifer Sapp vs Laura Lewandowski / Deeann Coe4-6, 2-6
2022-10-30Lost 01
L#1 DoublesTammi Molavi / Alexandria Arnold vs Nhi Eklund / Christine Driscoll0-6, 6-0, 0-1
2022-10-29vs ButcherLost 02
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Arnold / Fabiola Custodio vs Kimberly Walko / Amy Dawson2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesSadie Simpson / Sandra Julian vs Anh Le / Lisa Walsh1-6, 0-6
2022-10-23vs GibbsLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlexandria Arnold / Yngrid Sierra vs Abby Jacobson / Tina Rohm0-6, 6-7
2022-10-14vs LewandowskiLost 01
L#1 DoublesYngrid Sierra / Sue King vs Maria Nunnally / Caroline Hunolt2-6, 4-6
2022-10-09vs Orange SmashLost 01
L#1 DoublesSandra Julian / Kristen Kochanski vs Christine Driscoll / Holly Hill5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Anne Arundel Tri-Level 3.5,3.0,2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.49
Sue King
published
3.21
Fabiola Custodio
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Yngrid Sierra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
2.89
Regan Lonchena
published
2.39
Cathy Hoffman
published 2.5
2.37
Sandra Julian
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.19
Erin Isch
published 2.5
Kimberly Gowen
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christopher Gowen
0W–2L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sue King
10W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Fabiola Custodio
111W–97L career · 1 line in 2022
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Tammi Molavi
115W–132L career · 3 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3.5
Yngrid Sierra
165W–232L career · 4 lines in 2022
18%82%<1%
3.12
3
Alexandria Arnold
5W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%26%74%
3.08
Regan Lonchena
8W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
2.89
2.5
Cathy Hoffman
2W–12L career · no lines in 2022
0%79%21%
2.39
2.5
Sandra Julian
34W–71L career · 2 lines in 2022
0%84%16%
2.37
2.5
Erin Isch
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.19
Kimberly Gowen
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.