Teams

Vaughn 18+ 2.5W Singles Thurs PM

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM

6 players · average NTRP 2.88 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Tener Starling6-3, 6-1
L#2 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Meredith Lantz3-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Susan Barnes6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Noelle Budzyn6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesErin Wallace vs Jessica Kopp6-0, 6-2
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Jenifer Checo2-6, 0-6
W#1 SinglesErin Wallace vs Meredith Lantz6-3, 7-5
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Tener Starling4-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Lyndsey Grubb6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Jenifer Checo6-1, 6-1
L#2 SinglesErin Wallace vs Sydney Wittman5-7, 2-6
W#3 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Nakisha Boulware Watts6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Tener Starling6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Michelle Shumate6-1, 6-0
L#3 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Susan Barnes1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesClara Gonzalez Flores vs Jessica Kopp6-1, 6-0
W#2 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Jenifer Checo6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesErin Wallace vs Meredith Lantz5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesDiana Angeles vs Tener Starling6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Lyndsey Grubb6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMeredith Vaughn vs Jenifer Checo0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAllison Chisholm vs Noelle Budzyn6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 SinglesAllyson Wood vs Nakisha Boulware Watts6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women Singles Thurs PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Clara Gonzalez Flores
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.80
Diana Angeles
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.56
Allison Chisholm
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.40
Meredith Vaughn
usually #3 Singles 57%, also #2 Singles 29% · published
2.38
Allyson Wood
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Erin Wallace
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Clara Gonzalez Flores
43W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Diana Angeles
16W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
2.80
2.5
Allison Chisholm
27W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%34%66%
2.56
Meredith Vaughn
7W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%76%24%
2.40
3
Allyson Wood
15W–24L career · type S · 3 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Erin Wallace
8W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.