Teams

Kiwi - Huss

2022 Brevard Adult 18 & Over-Early Start · 3.5 Adult Early Start 18 and Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2021-12-13vs TTC - LauWon 10
W#2 DoublesTracey Draper / Betty Schaub vs Mei Kalman / Ashlea Frank6-4, 6-2
2021-12-06vs Rockledge - BarletWon 20
W#2 DoublesLeesa Brambach / Tracey Draper vs Jane Bonvillain / Julia Tulloch6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCasey Gilbert / Betty Schaub vs Kristel Phipps / Beatrice Barlet3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2021-11-29vs Suntree - Winner - DoddsWon 10
W#3 DoublesJennifer Jackson / Betty Schaub vs Nancy Fischer / Sarah Hirji7-5, 6-2
2021-11-15Won 10
W#3 DoublesLeesa Brambach / Christina Kopp vs Karen Lee / Anna Farach6-2, 7-5
2021-11-08Split 11
L#1 DoublesCynthia Huss / Christina Kopp vs Gisela Alcalde / Marie Forte2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCasey Gilbert / Betty Schaub vs Carol Becker / Brenda Knox6-3, 4-6, 1-0
2021-11-01Lost 01
L#3 DoublesBetty Schaub / Casey Gilbert vs Dawn Pfeil / Ashlea Frank2-6, 3-6
2021-10-30vs Rockledge - BarletWon 10
W#1 DoublesAnne Ramsey / Christina Kopp vs Kristen Crisafulli / Heather Lawrence6-4, 6-3
2021-10-18vs Suntree - Winner - DoddsLost 01
L#3 DoublesChristina Kopp / Tracey Draper vs Lee Harrington / Mandy Smith2-6, 4-6
2021-10-12Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Kopp / Anne Ramsey vs Brandi Maratta / Megan Magill3-6, 5-7
2021-10-04Won 10
W#3 DoublesTracey Draper / Stephanie Pellegrino vs Brenda Knox / Donna Paternoster6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Early Start 18 and Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
3.69
Christina Kopp
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.38
Anne Ramsey
published 3.5
3.29
Leesa Brambach
published
Casey Gilbert
published 3.5
3.17
Betty Schaub
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.07
Tracey Draper
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.95
Tracy Famiano
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Kopp + Tracey Draper2442% gamesnot enough data
Betty Schaub + Tracey Draper123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Rochelle Torgusen
48W–24L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Christina Kopp
68W–51L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
3.5
Anne Ramsey
9W–11L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.38
Leesa Brambach
3W–4L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Casey Gilbert
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Betty Schaub
25W–33L career · 5 lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
3.5
Tracey Draper
69W–115L career · 5 lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.07
Tracy Famiano
6W–7L career · no lines in 2022
66%34%<1%
2.95
Stephanie Pellegrino
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.