Teams

Br.Humphrey18S

2025 Capital Fall Singles 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.20 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-10-15Won 10
W#2 SinglesCarrie Patrick vs Laura Olson6-2, 6-4
2025-10-08Won 10
W#3 SinglesCara Mathers vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-09-24vs Ke.O’Rourke18SWon 20
W#2 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Sofia Switzer6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCara Mathers vs Ciara Whipp6-0, 6-0
2025-09-17vs Am.Brandon18SWon 10
W#3 SinglesCatherine Wilborne vs Kathan Griscik6-2, 6-2
2025-09-10Won 20
W#2 SinglesCara Mathers vs Laura Olson6-0, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCarrie Patrick vs Lauren Gray6-2, 6-3
2025-09-03vs Na.Rodriguez18SWon 20
W#1 SinglesCara Mathers vs Ashley Resta6-1, 6-1
W#3 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Sara Walker6-0, 6-1
2025-08-27vs St.Gupton18SSplit 11
W#1 SinglesCarrie Patrick vs Stuart Gupton6-2, 6-4
L#3 SinglesCatherine Wilborne vs Sydnor Coffman5-7, 4-6
2025-08-20vs De.Farmer18S3.0Won 10
W#1 SinglesMaggie Finney vs Taqiyya Yasin7-5, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.63
Cara Mathers
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.32
Sara Lilley
published
3.24
Maggie Finney
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.23
Rebecca O'Brien
published
3.10
Juliana Treleven
published
2.91
Carrie Patrick
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Singles 33% · published 3
2.85
Catherine Wilborne
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
2.82
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maggie Finney + Cara Mathers5256% games+9.3% vs expected
Brittany Humphrey + Juliana Treleven123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cara Mathers
37W–6L career · type S · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Sara Lilley
14W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Maggie Finney
34W–25L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Rebecca O'Brien
16W–18L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.23
Juliana Treleven
9W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
3
Carrie Patrick
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%73%27%
2.91
3
Catherine Wilborne
57W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Brittany Humphrey
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.