Teams

Garcia (Crandon Park)

2024 MIAMIDADE Adult 18 & Over - Spring - Night · 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.25 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-05-06vs Picard (Coral Pine)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAurora Garcia-Hoare / Raquel Mahomar vs Helen Picard / Nelly Foreiter6-1, 6-0
2024-04-29vs Thayer (Coral Reef)Won 10
W#2 DoublesAurora Garcia-Hoare / Raquel Mahomar vs Cassandra Sosa / Yolanda Sosa6-0, 6-1
2024-04-15vs Miami/Roque/18&over3.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesRaquel Mahomar / Aurora Garcia-Hoare vs Kimberley Martinez / Claudia Donnelly6-0, 6-0
2024-04-01vs Alkhaldi (Taco Tennis)Won 10
W#3 DoublesAurora Garcia-Hoare / Raquel Mahomar vs Louise Starr / Maylu Hernandez6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesRaquel Mahomar / Aurora Garcia-Hoare vs Mariana Fernandez Freire / Maggie Terrazas6-2, 6-1
2024-03-11vs Picard (Coral Pine)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMaria Salas / Raquel Mahomar vs BRIDGET MURPHY / Hannah Standiford4-6, 6-7
2024-02-19vs Bill’s Angels (Aventura JCC)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesRaquel Mahomar / Maria Salas vs Bianca Capella / Sonila Zarate4-6, 0-6
2024-02-12vs Miami/Roque/18&over3.0WWon 10
W#2 DoublesCarla Conde / Raquel Mahomar vs Lisette Trimble / Mary Maxwell6-2, 0-6, 1-0
2024-01-29vs Alkhaldi (Taco Tennis)Won 10
W#3 DoublesMaria Salas / Raquel Mahomar vs Bobbie Garrison / Martha Maldonado Alkhaldi7-5, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMartha Falls / Raquel Mahomar vs Yersika Fernandez Labrador / Mildred Houdayer6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Adult 18 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Carla Conde
published 3.5
2.99
Jamie Musacchio
published
2.96
Yamila Porras
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.84
Martha Falls
published
2.82
Maria Salas
published
2.78
Courtney Fallon
published 3
2.77
Raquel Mahomar
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.74
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Carolina Perera + Maria Salas3354% games+3.7% vs expected
Raquel Mahomar + Maria Salas123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Carla Conde
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%18%
3.37
Jamie Musacchio
5W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
2.99
3.5
Yamila Porras
116W–114L career · 7 lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.96
Martha Falls
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%13%
2.84
Maria Salas
12W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
2.82
3
Courtney Fallon
5W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Raquel Mahomar
28W–25L career · 10 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
2.77
Maria Carolina Perera
10W–14L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
2.74

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.