Teams

LPTC YELLOW

2022 ITA MIXED DOUBLES - DEN · MIXED 8.5 - ITA

12 players · average NTRP 4.28 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-08-21vs NJ GREENLost 03
L#1 DoublesTomas Mendez / Michelle Campbell vs Craig Hoeltgen / K Autumn Hartley6-4, 0-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Kara Jewett vs Trevor Updegraff / Mary Jo George7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJeffrey Monroe / Sydney Stroup vs Patrick Sprowls / Crystal Campbell Messer2-6, 4-6
2022-08-14vs BP GREENSplit 11
L#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Tomas Mendez vs Casey Rhine / Ryan Ratcliffe4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Dorothy Monroe vs Claire Collins / Joe Hendricks7-6, 6-4
2022-08-07vs NJ BLUELost 12
L#1 DoublesMeng Lian / Dorothy Monroe vs Jamal Heydari / Megan Fischbach2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Melucci / Christopher Johnstone vs Hank Fisher / Kirstin Kraig6-1, 6-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrett Vladika / Amber McGregor vs Anne Steputis / Andre Greene4-6, 4-6
2022-07-31vs BM BLUEWon 21
L#1 DoublesBrett Vladika / Kara Jewett vs Susan Jeffries / Andrew Jeffries6-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMeng Lian / Dorothy Monroe vs Aree Bly / Mitchell McGregor6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAmber McGregor / Jeffrey Monroe vs Max Begoon / Emma Schilling4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2022-07-24vs PH GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Sydney Stroup vs Stephen Luedtke / Candice Saxon7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichelle Campbell / Brett Vladika vs Christin Johnson / Doug Johnson1-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmber McGregor / Jeffrey Monroe vs Sandy Baker / Daniel Read6-4, 6-0
2022-07-17vs BP REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Tomas Mendez vs Adam Knox / Leslie Lane3-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesPhilip Dixon-Patterson / Megan Melucci vs Elaine Knox / Kevin Matney6-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBrett Vladika / Kara Jewett vs Meg Staebell / Travis Staebell3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-07-10vs KC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesBobbie Lutz / Meng Lian vs Debbie Lathrop / Devin van Treeck4-6, 6-7
L#2 DoublesMegan Melucci / Tomas Mendez vs Rachel Frisz / Andrew Hamilton3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristopher Johnstone / Sydney Stroup vs Kevin Ross / Susan McGarry6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings4 teams · MIXED 8.5 - ITA
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1DTP YELLOW5113511136
2SSH SILVER2581329207
3LPTC YELLOW2571430207
4CP ORANGE0651328203

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.92 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.27
Meng Lian
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Megan Melucci
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.17
Amber McGregor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.08
Philip Dixon-Patterson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.06
Christopher Johnstone
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.80
Brett Vladika
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.73
Michelle Campbell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.71
Kara Jewett
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.67
Bobbie Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.52
Dorothy Monroe
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Jeffrey Monroe
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Tomas Mendez
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amber McGregor + Meng Lian2647% games−1.1% vs expected
Philip Dixon-Patterson + Dorothy Monroe1443% games−3.0% vs expected
Bobbie Lutz + Tomas Mendez0535% gamesnot enough data
Meng Lian + Dorothy Monroe224 matchesnot enough data
Bobbie Lutz + Philip Dixon-Patterson044 matchesnot enough data
Brett Vladika + Kara Jewett134 matchesnot enough data
Meng Lian + Megan Melucci123 matchesnot enough data
Michelle Campbell + Philip Dixon-Patterson033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Meng Lian
102W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Megan Melucci
106W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Amber McGregor
52W–63L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Philip Dixon-Patterson
62W–81L career · 3 lines in 2022
28%72%<1%
4.08
4.5
Christopher Johnstone
66W–39L career · 3 lines in 2022
33%67%<1%
4.06
4
Brett Vladika
98W–62L career · 7 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
Michelle Campbell
64W–89L career · 6 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Kara Jewett
57W–42L career · 3 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.71
4
Bobbie Lutz
109W–67L career · 3 lines in 2022
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Dorothy Monroe
59W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
45%55%<1%
3.52
Jeffrey Monroe
19W–12L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Tomas Mendez
23W–37L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.