Teams

TRC - Pounders

2025 B'ham Fall - Adult 65 & Over · 3.0 Women 65 & Over - Wednesday 1:30

10 players · average NTRP / ALABAMA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-12vs PRC - Watford/EnglishWon 21
W#1 DoublesChristine Smith / Terri Russell vs Carol Rutherford / Ella Ruth Stewart6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesNora Stokes / Joanie Waldron vs Nancy English / Jan Poe6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJulie Pounders / Janet Muller vs Carleen Morin / Inez Sawyer6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-24vs PRC - Watford/EnglishWon 30
W#1 DoublesTerri Russell / Christine Smith vs Kathryn Hornsby / Jan Poe6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesNora Stokes / Laura Murrell vs Inez Sawyer / Marie Watford6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTerry Schlitz / Janet Muller vs Carleen Morin / Gayle Leal6-3, 6-4
2025-09-10vs RIVERCHASE - Norris/BaldwinWon 20
W#1 DoublesChristine Smith / Terri Russell vs Mary Lou Lackey / Karen Norris6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesNora Stokes / Sharon Dobbs vs Barbara Baldwin / Jeanne Barelare6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women 65 & Over - Wednesday 1:30 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.81 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Terri Russell
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.90
Sharon Dobbs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Joanie Waldron
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Terry Schlitz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Laura Murrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.62
Nora Stokes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Janet Muller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joy Mullins
published
Julie Pounders
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Sherri McKendree
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanie Waldron + Terri Russell8651% games−0.8% vs expected
Sharon Dobbs + Terri Russell314 matchesnot enough data
Janet Muller + Julie Pounders033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Terri Russell
34W–17L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%45%55%
3.02
Sharon Dobbs
13W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Joanie Waldron
17W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Terry Schlitz
15W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Laura Murrell
17W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
2.70
Nora Stokes
14W–26L career · 3 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
Janet Muller
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Joy Mullins
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Julie Pounders
0W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sherri McKendree
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.