Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE 18AW4.0A

2025 ADULT 18&Over · Women's 4.0

22 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.59 estimated across 20 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Deana Dyal
published 4
3.85
Michelle Nicholson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.73
Kristen Good
published
3.72
Robyn Vanderluit
published
3.71
Mattie Wei
published
3.70
Donna Blyshak
published
3.68
Megan Devlin
published
3.66
Yuki Taguchi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.63
Vivian Gabel
published
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
published
3.63
Tomi Nakamura
published
3.61
Joni Bartlett
published
3.57
Janel Canepa
published
3.55
Heather La France
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.48
Vesna Mardesic
published
3.43
Donna Eaton
published
3.33
May Mu
published
3.32
Denise Hall
published 3.5
3.30
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
published
3.28
Quynh Luu
published
Patricia Spratt
published
Savitha Anjanappa
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Donna Blyshak + Vivian Gabel5553% games−2.1% vs expected
Janel Canepa + Joni Bartlett224 matchesnot enough data
Janel Canepa + May Mu033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Deana Dyal
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%57%43%
3.98
Michelle Nicholson
45W–22L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%84%15%
3.85
Kristen Good
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
3.73
Robyn Vanderluit
9W–14L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%2%
3.72
Mattie Wei
13W–3L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Donna Blyshak
12W–10L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Megan Devlin
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
10%89%1%
3.68
Yuki Taguchi
16W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.66
Vivian Gabel
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
17%82%<1%
3.63
Patama Suvarnarat
4W–14L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Tomi Nakamura
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.63
Joni Bartlett
13W–20L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
Janel Canepa
16W–17L career · no lines in 2025
32%68%<1%
3.57
Heather La France
11W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
36%64%<1%
3.55
Vesna Mardesic
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.48
Donna Eaton
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
3.43
May Mu
6W–16L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Denise Hall
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%9%
3.32
Luz Diaz Arbelaez
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%8%
3.30
Quynh Luu
12W–16L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Patricia Spratt
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Savitha Anjanappa
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.