Teams

GEPTA-3.5-Adult/18+M(Broome)(CCC)

SouthernNewMexico · 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

15 players · average NTRP 3.19 / GEPTA

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 2025 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Danny Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Alejandro Orozco
usually #2 Singles 38%, also #1 Singles 38% · published 3.5
2.93
Eddie Nassar
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #3 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
2.83
Dennis Rodriguez
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #3 Doubles 31% · published 3
Brendan Corrigan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Britton Boyd
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Chad Follett
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.73
David Turbay
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
Jorge Kareh
usually #1 Doubles 53%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Juan Acevedo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 32% · published
Octavio Corral
usually #1 Singles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Stephane Martel
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Tito Herrera
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 18% · published
Zachary Broome
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eddie Nassar + Danny Nassar2539% games−13.3% vs expected
Eddie Nassar + Stephane Martel8846% gamesnot enough data
Danny Nassar + Stephane Martel2647% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Tito Herrera2447% gamesnot enough data
Alejandro Orozco + Tito Herrera1543% gamesnot enough data
Dennis Rodriguez + Jorge Kareh2446% gamesnot enough data
Zachary Broome + Dennis Rodriguez4163% gamesnot enough data
Eddie Nassar + Juan Acevedo2346% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Danny Nassar
19W–43L career · 8 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Alejandro Orozco
23W–40L career · 8 lines in 2025
3%94%2%
3.24
3.5
Eddie Nassar
38W–61L career · 11 lines in 2025
71%29%<1%
2.93
3
Dennis Rodriguez
45W–57L career · 39 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Brendan Corrigan
3W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Britton Boyd
0W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chad Follett
6W–18L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
David Turbay
18W–25L career · 5 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
Jorge Kareh
74W–111L career · 40 lines in 2025
not enough data
Juan Acevedo
52W–84L career · 28 lines in 2025
not enough data
Octavio Corral
32W–31L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sebastian Martinez-Villalba
8W–16L career · 9 lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephane Martel
49W–87L career · 18 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tito Herrera
15W–51L career · 10 lines in 2025
not enough data
Zachary Broome
17W–37L career · 17 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.