Teams

NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Malinowski/Stalker-Southview

2022 NWO Adult 18 & Over Night · NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHWESTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
W#1 DoublesSean Marzano / Brian Buckey vs D Lee Johnson / Christopher Seiple7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAaron Li / Roger Girts vs Kevin Brooks / Phil Dionyssiou6-4, 3-6, 1-0
2022-07-19vs NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Shaffer PTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesBrian Buckey / Nathaniel Long vs Koroush Sheikhi / Nathan Englehart4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRoger Girts vs Steven Eilert6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSrini Hejeebu / Aaron Li vs Rick Busselle / Yvo Arias1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRoger Girts vs Nile Kamlani7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesSean Marzano / Aaron Li vs Jason Raike / David Tobar4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSrini Hejeebu / Daniel Stalker vs Ty Langenderfer / Travis Baltz3-6, 3-6
2022-06-28vs NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Caig- PTCWon 31
L#1 SinglesDavid Bodenmiller vs Ian Jacobs0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSean Marzano / Brian Buckey vs Gary Swartzbeck / Bob Kolvey6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesRoger Girts vs Robert Horn6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSrini Hejeebu / Aaron Li vs Gilbert Sinco / Matt Unger6-3, 6-2
L#1 DoublesDavid Malinowski / Daniel Stalker vs Adam Gstalder / Jeff Sanford0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSean Marzano / Srini Hejeebu vs Claude Fixler / Karl Huss1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 DoublesSean Marzano / Brian Buckey vs Hani Haidar / Guillermo Guardia4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Bodenmiller vs Mohamad Haidar1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Malinowski / Daniel Stalker vs James Haxton / Iyad Haidar6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSrini Hejeebu / Roger Girts vs Ronald Jurgenson / Todd Guardiola2-6, 2-6
2022-06-07vs NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Besaw-WauseonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDaniel Stalker / David Malinowski vs Nate Besaw / Steve Oberlin3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSean Marzano / Brian Buckey vs Michael Murry / Jordan Braun6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJames Schifko / Roger Girts vs Austin Kleman / Gabriel Pietrykowski3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2022-05-31vs NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Wilkins-TTCLost 03
L#1 DoublesDaniel Stalker / Brian Buckey vs John Oswald / Timothy Fisher1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAaron Li / Sean Marzano vs Timothy Hoover / William Nicholson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJames Schifko / Roger Girts vs Dennis Meacham / Kim Degner4-6, 4-6
2022-05-24vs NWO 18&Over 4.0 Men Morse-Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSean Marzano / Daniel Stalker vs Ryo Kitamura / Sushil Sudershan3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesDavid Bodenmiller vs Kyle Crocker2-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesRoger Girts vs Joey Martin1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJames Schifko / Aaron Li vs James Kaczorowski / Gilbert Rangel Jr1-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesDavid Bodenmiller / Sean Marzano vs Lewis Johnson / Ross Violette1-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAaron Li / Brian Buckey vs Scott Elbin / Zachary Elbin1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRoger Girts vs Luciano Oliveira6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSrini Hejeebu / James Schifko vs Ray Elbin / Brent Harris3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NWO Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.40 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Brian Buckey
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 4
Daniel Stalker
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.68
Sean Marzano
usually #2 Doubles 56%, also #1 Doubles 44% · published
3.39
Roger Girts
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 27% · published
3.29
Srini Hejeebu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
James Schifko
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.24
Aaron Li
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
Abdol Abdouni
published
David Bodenmiller
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jared Freeman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Nathaniel Long
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sean Marzano + Brian Buckey314 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Stalker + Srini Hejeebu314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Buckey
11W–9L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Daniel Stalker
11W–17L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sean Marzano
23W–27L career · 9 lines in 2022
8%91%1%
3.68
Roger Girts
104W–96L career · 14 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.39
Srini Hejeebu
83W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
James Schifko
25W–38L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Aaron Li
45W–50L career · 7 lines in 2022
3%94%2%
3.24
Abdol Abdouni
14W–42L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
David Bodenmiller
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Jared Freeman
40W–33L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nathaniel Long
9W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.