Teams

SD HT Balboa TC/ Crawford

2026 SoCal Tri-Level Doubles WE- Summer SD · SDNC

17 players · average NTRP 4.03 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-08-30vs SDNC HT FRCC/ CaringalWon 21
L#1 DoublesMaegen Demko / Giana Guerra vs Emily Bernstein / Sarena Talbert6-3, 1-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSamantha Polikowski / Catherine Sheils vs Susan Lee / Kendal Texeira7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSarah Dudley / Clara Tan vs Hillary Emery / Clare Lemon6-4, 6-3
L#1 DoublesMaegen Demko / Mikayla Vincent vs Carla Zarbo / Elizabeth Zebian2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesANGIE CRAWFORD / Anna Raiff vs Guadalupe Garcia / Whitney Nyholm6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLaura Edmondson / Kaili Ghio vs Annie Kyle / Hayley Moore6-3, 6-3
2026-08-16vs SD HT Mtn View/ RuffoLost 12
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Chafe / Mikayla Vincent vs Fabiola Flores / Claudia Mendiola6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesKelly Jernigan / Anna Raiff vs Alexandra Chavez Caro / Meg Dawson6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSarah Dudley / Clara Tan vs Dania Michelle Castillo / Yasuko Stanley2-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-08-09vs SD HT SDTRC/ SchultzelWon 10
W#1 DoublesMaegen Demko / Cynthia Herrera vs Whitney Ginter / Gretchen Shaffer6-3, 7-5
2026-07-12vs SD HT SDTRC/ SchultzelLost 01
L#3 DoublesSarah Dudley / Shiela Murali vs Paige Hazard / Leslie Hazard5-7, 3-6
2026-07-05vs SD HT UCSD (3PM)/ LeeLost 01
L#1 DoublesCynthia Herrera / Maegen Demko vs Vivian Lee / Weng Si Leong3-6, 4-6
2026-06-28vs SD HT Mtn View/ RuffoLost 02
L#1 DoublesMaegen Demko / Cynthia Herrera vs Guadalupe Rendon / Zoe Davis3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesYekaterina Smotrich / Laura Edmondson vs Kurumi Nishioka / Brenda Henriquez4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings7 teams · SDNC
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SD HT Mtn View/ Ruffo4212615149
2SD HT Peninsula TC/ DeForest4210818151
3SD HT SDTRC/ Schultzel329615136
4SD HT Tierrasanta Tennis Club/ Emhardt3310819161
5SDNC HT FRCC/ Caringal2351021163
6SD HT Balboa TC/ Crawford2461225170
7SD HT UCSD (3PM)/ Lee135714116

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.29
Cynthia Herrera
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.24
Mikayla Vincent
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Hillary Park
published 4.5
4.19
Jacqueline Chafe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.17
Maegen Demko
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.95
Giana Guerra
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
ANGIE CRAWFORD
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.82
Catherine Sheils
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.81
Anna Raiff
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.79
Lisa Paler
published 4
3.76
Laura Edmondson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.75
Samantha Polikowski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Yekaterina Smotrich
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Sarah Dudley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Kaili Ghio
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Shiela Murali
published 3.5
3.24
Clara Tan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maegen Demko + Cynthia Herrera3546% games+1.4% vs expected
Maegen Demko + Jacqueline Chafe5156% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Paler + Mikayla Vincent5055% gamesnot enough data
Giana Guerra + Anna Raiff2349% gamesnot enough data
Kaili Ghio + Clara Tan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cynthia Herrera
14W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Mikayla Vincent
47W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
4.24
4.5
Hillary Park
67W–41L career · no lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Jacqueline Chafe
97W–71L career · 2 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Maegen Demko
101W–74L career · 2 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
4.17
4
Giana Guerra
51W–42L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
ANGIE CRAWFORD
23W–13L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
3.92
4
Catherine Sheils
51W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Anna Raiff
34W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Lisa Paler
30W–30L career · no lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
Laura Edmondson
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.76
4
Samantha Polikowski
40W–71L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
3.75
3.5
Yekaterina Smotrich
176W–89L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%52%48%
3.49
Sarah Dudley
11W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.42
3.5
Kaili Ghio
59W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
3.40
3.5
Shiela Murali
21W–8L career · no lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
3.39
3.5
Clara Tan
53W–43L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.