Teams

PBTC RAY

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.12 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs CSCC KOLMANWon 31
W#1 DoublesPamela Parks / Brigitte Juarez vs Chana Kolman / Carol Pepper6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAna Bhagat vs Glenda Coto Meckbel6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesRochelle Wristen / Cecily Donovan vs Becky Cleveland / Kari Leach4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJoan Barickman / Kristina Proctor vs Leslee Bray / Kathryn Seibert6-0, 6-3
2024-07-08vs MEMPK VIEIRASplit 22
W#1 DoublesCecily Donovan / Brigitte Juarez vs CHRISTINE RANDONO / Brittany DeCaires2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesAna Bhagat vs Kris Quinones7-5, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKristina Proctor / Nora Day vs Stacey Self / Sarah Vanderbeck1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Barickman / Rochelle Wristen vs Teresa Vieira / Elizabeth Price6-1, 4-6, 0-1
2024-07-01vs CCOC BONICELLILost 13
L#1 DoublesAna Bhagat / Brigitte Juarez vs Austin Lawhorn / Kit McFarland6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVanessa Madrid vs Joy Farmer6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesRochelle Wristen / Joan Barickman vs Mallory Sharp / Melissa Jamison4-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesNora Day / Pamela Parks vs Jenisha Bonicelli / Anne Janda6-7, 6-1, 0-1
2024-06-24vs FHCS CUSTINESplit 22
L#1 DoublesRochelle Wristen / Brigitte Juarez vs Christine Waasdorp Hurtado / Christine Bong7-5, 4-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesVanessa Madrid vs Jessica Daniels6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesNora Day / Kristina Proctor vs Amanda Tiffany / Amy Hanson2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Barickman / Pamela Parks vs Elisabeth Siebert / Judy Custine6-4, 6-2
2024-06-17vs CSRC RAMSEYLost 04
L#1 DoublesRochelle Wristen / Brigitte Juarez vs Cheri Ramsey / Jennifer Peck5-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCecily Donovan vs Mary Beth Yockey2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPamela Parks / Kristina Proctor vs Allison Guinn / MARY SCOTT1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesJoan Barickman / Jean Ray vs Jennifer Gonzales / Cindy Hoit1-6, 0-6
2024-06-10vs CSCC KOLMANSplit 22
W#1 DoublesVanessa Madrid / Brigitte Juarez vs Carol Pepper / Chana Kolman6-1, 6-3
L#1 SinglesAna Bhagat vs Kim Weston7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesNora Day / Rochelle Wristen vs Glenda Coto Meckbel / Ronda Holton6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJean Ray / Cecily Donovan vs Becky Cleveland / Kristi McCann6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2024-06-03vs MEMPK VIEIRAWon 31
W#1 DoublesAna Bhagat / Brigitte Juarez vs Brittany DeCaires / CHRISTINE RANDONO6-1, 6-3
W#1 SinglesRochelle Wristen vs Jessica Langley6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesCecily Donovan / Kristina Proctor vs Sarah Vanderbeck / Kathy Eaton3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJoan Barickman / Jean Ray vs Jane Doe / Kris Quinones6-2, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Geepress Corpuz
published 3.5
Cecily Donovan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Ana Bhagat
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.70
Rochelle Wristen
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
2.67
Brigitte Juarez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Nora Day
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.40
Kristina Proctor
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Jean Ray
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Joan Barickman
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Pamela Parks
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Vanessa Madrid
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jean Ray + Cecily Donovan6262% games+12.0% vs expected
Ana Bhagat + Brigitte Juarez4255% games+2.1% vs expected
Cecily Donovan + Brigitte Juarez4350% games−0.7% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Ana Bhagat3448% games−3.6% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Cecily Donovan1741% games−6.2% vs expected
Rochelle Wristen + Brigitte Juarez1842% games−8.0% vs expected
Joan Barickman + Kristina Proctor134 matchesnot enough data
Rochelle Wristen + Vanessa Madrid224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Geepress Corpuz
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
8%92%1%
3.19
3
Cecily Donovan
25W–34L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Ana Bhagat
28W–25L career · 5 lines in 2024
3%95%2%
2.75
Rochelle Wristen
23W–45L career · 7 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Brigitte Juarez
20W–43L career · 7 lines in 2024
10%90%1%
2.67
Nora Day
15W–34L career · 4 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Kristina Proctor
2W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
79%21%<1%
2.40
Jean Ray
9W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Joan Barickman
4W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data
Pamela Parks
4W–15L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Vanessa Madrid
15W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.