Teams

Harris/Knoxville

2025 Adult 18 & Over-Knoxville · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-26vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleWon 21
L#1 DoublesWindsor Wall / Jennifer Johnson vs Annabel Sims / Catherine Shuman4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Martin vs Keri Brill6-1, 7-5
W#2 DoublesEmilie Harris / Holly Hoyle vs Natalia Ward / Betsy Wood7-5, 6-2
2025-04-19vs Waide/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesAubrey Vick / Samantha Feuer vs Alyssa Maddox / Elizabeth Waide6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHolly Hoyle vs Rebecca Bender4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMegan Campbell / Lauren Goodman vs Jamie Iverson / LeAnn Waide3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Brill-Shuman/KnoxvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesJennifer Johnson / Aubrey Vick vs Renee Bagwell / Catherine Shuman5-7, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLaurel Martin vs Betsy Wood6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Hone / Lauren Goodman vs Annette Thompson / Keri Brill6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-03-08vs Waide/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesAubrey Vick / Windsor Wall vs Kim Huinker / Alaina Smith7-6, 6-1
L#1 SinglesEmilie Harris vs Rebecca Bender1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesLaurel Martin / Samantha Feuer vs Jamie Iverson / Meg Stratton6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.30 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.60
Holly Hoyle
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Laurel Martin
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.37
Windsor Wall
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Aubrey Vick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.16
Jackie Hone
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.06
Samantha Feuer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.04
Lauren Goodman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emilie Harris
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Singles 20% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Holly Hoyle
4W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.60
Laurel Martin
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Windsor Wall
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%82%18%
2.37
2.5
Aubrey Vick
2W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jackie Hone
4W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Samantha Feuer
1W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.06
Lauren Goodman
5W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Emilie Harris
3W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.