Teams

Westwood Fitts

2023 Richmond Flexible Format Women · Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0

16 players · average NTRP 3.08 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Richmond Flexible Format Women 6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.47
Kristin Zach
published
3.30
Jamie McLeod
published
Cody Nystrom
published 3.5
3.21
Katie Fitts
published
3.16
Jenny Sharrar
published
3.09
Meredith Berger
published
3.05
Sara Sloman
published
3.04
Frances Wilkinson
published
2.96
Samantha Wetzel
published
2.77
Amelia Lovette
published 3
2.69
2.64
2.60
Caroline Caudill
published 3
2.51
Kelly Thoerig
published
2.50
Carleen DiMeglio
published 3
Donna Dean
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristin Zach
33W–20L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.47
Jamie McLeod
11W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.30
3.5
Cody Nystrom
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Katie Fitts
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.21
Jenny Sharrar
15W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Meredith Berger
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Sara Sloman
14W–8L career · no lines in 2023
<1%37%63%
3.05
Frances Wilkinson
8W–4L career · no lines in 2023
<1%39%61%
3.04
Samantha Wetzel
19W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%63%37%
2.96
3
Amelia Lovette
21W–19L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Catherine Stanley
8W–14L career · no lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Ashley Sommardahl
7W–8L career · no lines in 2023
16%83%<1%
2.64
3
Caroline Caudill
5W–9L career · type A · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
2.60
Kelly Thoerig
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
47%53%<1%
2.51
3
Carleen DiMeglio
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
2.50
Donna Dean
7W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.