Teams

ROLLINGWOOD CW7.5A

2023 COMBO · Women 7.5

8 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.73 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.22
Natalie Halvorsen
published
4.12
Michelle Strain
published
3.76
Michelle Komlenic
published
3.63
Amandeep Kaur
published 4
3.61
Karen Melton
published
3.58
Stacey Matteoli
published
3.17
Janelle Schultz
published
Mary Shade
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Halvorsen
17W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%5%95%
4.22
Michelle Strain
34W–18L career · no lines in 2023
<1%17%83%
4.12
Michelle Komlenic
14W–11L career · no lines in 2023
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Amandeep Kaur
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
16%84%<1%
3.63
Karen Melton
4W–18L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.61
Stacey Matteoli
8W–16L career · no lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.58
Janelle Schultz
6W–4L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.17
Mary Shade
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.