Teams

Grafton -NC- Oxford

2025 Adult 18&Over-NC · Women 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-05-01vs Fowler - NC - SouhavenSplit 11
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Suzy Bowman vs Kristi McCrory / Jenna Cutshall6-0, 7-5
L#2 DoublesPamela Grafton / Madelyn Marley vs Tracy Duff / Jennifer Wright1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-04-27vs Fullilove -NC-BatesvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Brown / Suzy Bowman vs Alison van Brocklin / Ashley Roberson6-1
2025-04-22vs Fullilove -NC-BatesvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesSuzy Bowman / Emily Brown vs Vicki Ferguson / Aimee Goforth6-2, 6-2
2025-04-09vs Fowler - NC - SouhavenWon 10
W#3 DoublesMadelyn Marley / Stephanie Oliver vs Claire Fowler / Kristi Sides6-0, 6-1
2025-03-30vs Fowler - NC - SouhavenSplit 11
W#2 DoublesMadelyn Marley / Caitlin Thomas vs Claire Fowler / Kristi Sides6-3, 6-3
L#2 SinglesSuzy Bowman vs Tracy Duff6-4, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Stephanie Oliver
published
3.89
Suzy Bowman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 4
3.78
Lesley Grubbs
published
3.77
Caitlin Thomas
published 4
Amy Killebrew
published 4
3.74
Madelyn Marley
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.74
Nicole Amaro
published
3.62
Andrea Henry
published 4
3.45
Christy Prine
published 4
3.45
Pamela Grafton
published
3.34
Carmen Lewis
published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stephanie Oliver + Madelyn Marley9072% games+5.3% vs expected
Madelyn Marley + Suzy Bowman4161% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Oliver
10W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
3.90
4
Suzy Bowman
111W–38L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.89
Lesley Grubbs
51W–17L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Caitlin Thomas
25W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
3.77
4
Amy Killebrew
no matches on record · type S · no lines in 2025
not enough data
4
Madelyn Marley
103W–43L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Nicole Amaro
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
97%3%<1%
3.74
4
Andrea Henry
32W–32L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Christy Prine
9W–2L career · no lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
Pamela Grafton
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
3.45
4
Carmen Lewis
14W–9L career · no lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.34

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.