Teams

SChandler (Raintree)

2025 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 6.5 Women

14 players · average NTRP 3.11 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-10-08vs RAddison/KMoore (Park Road)Won 21
W#1 DoublesKatie Eggers / Niki Koesel vs Paige Cardell / Mary Claire Brown6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKelley Baughman / Leigh Bellardini vs Katie Jernigan / Mary Kathryn Lozzi3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Klingman / Suzanne MacVicar vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-10-01vs SJPragasam/KLoor (Jeff Adams)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesCaroline Cox / Tricia Shaw vs Margaret Cart / Liesl Graf7-6, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Sarah Prochaska vs Barbara Davis / Erica Powell3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Laur / Kimberlee Curley vs Vicki King / Erin Roach2-6, 4-6
2025-09-24vs VTolson/Petras (Firethorne)Won 21
L#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Caroline Cox vs Kim King / Caroline Lattanzi4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Julie Klingman vs Bethany Ronchetta / TARA RAND6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Chandler / Christine Demille vs Jennifer Pollino / Tracy McLaughlin6-1, 6-4
2025-09-17vs KLull/LPowell (Bridgehampton)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesKatie Eggers / Tricia Shaw vs Deepti Dua / Virginia Katzen7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSusan Chandler / Ciara McKiernan vs Shannon Lind / Stacey Reinhardt3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Laur / Suzanne MacVicar vs Amy Eberhardt / Jennifer Challis6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-09-10vs MKelling/RJoplin (Queens)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSusan Chandler / Tricia Shaw vs Brooke Leonnig / Dominique Greene2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSarah Prochaska / Kelley Baughman vs Bridget Happney / Heather Skelton0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Christine Demille vs Amber Nee / Carrie Letorney6-7, 6-3, 0-1
2025-09-03vs LHuntington (Queens)Won 21
W#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Katie Eggers vs Lisa Huntington / Julie Moore4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Julie Klingman vs Catherine Crigler / Pam Bright6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKimberlee Curley / Suzanne MacVicar vs Punky Brick / Laura Case1-6, 3-6
2025-08-27vs KGreathouse/JBee (Russell)Won 30
W#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Caroline Cox vs Debbie Barnes / Taylor James6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesChristine Demille / Leigh Bellardini vs Jane Bee / Alexandra Centeno6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSusan Chandler / Elizabeth Laur vs Jena Lepkowski / Anja Skljarevski6-1, 6-0
2025-08-20vs HLee/Rock (Piper Glen)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCaroline Cox / Kelley Baughman vs Stephanie Rock / Christina Dunn7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Sarah Prochaska vs Hilary Lee / Hayley Franc1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKimberlee Curley / Tricia Shaw vs Allyson McDonough / Tyler Brody0-6, 2-6
2025-08-13vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKatie Eggers / Caroline Cox vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Jenny Kim1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Chandler / Tricia Shaw vs Felicia Ahn / Jane Lee3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Julie Klingman vs Annika Leintz / Nancy Liu4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 6.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Caroline Cox
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 3.5
3.12
Katie Eggers
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Susan Chandler
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.96
Tricia Shaw
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.95
Niki Koesel
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.94
Leigh Bellardini
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.91
Christine Demille
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Julie Klingman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.83
Kimberlee Curley
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Ciara McKiernan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.73
Kelley Baughman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Elizabeth Laur
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Sarah Prochaska
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Shaw + Katie Eggers5160% games+19.9% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Katie Eggers7357% games+10.9% vs expected
Julie Klingman + Leigh Bellardini4156% games+4.0% vs expected
Susan Chandler + Ciara McKiernan5358% games+1.3% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Tricia Shaw5157% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Tricia Shaw1430% gamesnot enough data
Sarah Prochaska + Ciara McKiernan224 matchesnot enough data
Kelley Baughman + Leigh Bellardini314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Caroline Cox
13W–27L career · 7 lines in 2025
6%93%1%
3.21
Katie Eggers
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.12
Susan Chandler
35W–30L career · 5 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
3.03
Tricia Shaw
30W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Niki Koesel
112W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
2.95
3
Leigh Bellardini
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%69%31%
2.94
3.5
Christine Demille
11W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
75%25%<1%
2.91
3
Julie Klingman
40W–32L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
3
Suzanne MacVicar
89W–101L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.83
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
3
Ciara McKiernan
59W–47L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
2.79
Kelley Baughman
10W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Elizabeth Laur
9W–16L career · 5 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
2.64
Sarah Prochaska
4W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.