Teams

TCU QUAST

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Ladies · Friday Ladies 4.5

16 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-04-03vs BIR VANDEBERGHELost 01
L#2 DoublesTiffini Williams / Tarin Wallace vs Sofia Zulim / Kelda Rusher4-6, 6-7
2026-03-27vs TCU QUAST***Won 10
W#3 DoublesTiffini Williams / Tarin Wallace vs Ashli Urano / MaryKate Marini6-4, 5-7, 1-0
2026-03-13vs BIR VANDEBERGHELost 01
L#1 DoublesLucy Presley / Melinda Mooney vs Michelle Behm / Ashley Reaves4-6, 3-6
2026-03-06vs TCU QUAST***Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChelsea James / Leslie Eugenio vs Ashley Reaves / Tiffany Miller2-6, 0-6
2026-02-27vs RTC PUNGWE/HOLTLost 01
L#2 DoublesMelinda Mooney / Lucy Presley vs Kate VandeBerghe / Brooke Cabianca2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-02-20vs BIR VANDEBERGHELost 01
L#1 DoublesTiffini Williams / Emily Lu vs Kenda Bevill / Erin Piel6-2, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Friday Ladies 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Christy Vutam
usually #1 Singles 56%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published 4.5
4.35
Melissa Walters
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
4.24
Corrine Quast
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4.5
4.24
Emily Lu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.23
Lucy Presley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.20
Aubrey Findley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.09
Marcela Serna
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
4.08
Erin Barnes
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Tarin Wallace
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.06
Chelsea James
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.05
Melinda Mooney
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.04
Caroline Baden
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
3.97
Tiffini Williams
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.97
Christina Cung
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.74
Leslie Eugenio
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sandy Beasley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melissa Walters + Corrine Quast224 matchesnot enough data
Tiffini Williams + Emily Lu213 matchesnot enough data
Tiffini Williams + Tarin Wallace123 matchesnot enough data
Caroline Baden + Chelsea James123 matchesnot enough data
Melinda Mooney + Lucy Presley033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Christy Vutam
40W–14L career · 8 lines in 2026
<1%48%52%
4.51
Melissa Walters
37W–20L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%88%12%
4.35
4.5
Corrine Quast
20W–18L career · 7 lines in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
4.5
Emily Lu
22W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
3%94%2%
4.24
Lucy Presley
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Aubrey Findley
63W–34L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
4.20
Marcela Serna
15W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
4.09
4.5
Erin Barnes
23W–11L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
4.08
Tarin Wallace
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
31%69%<1%
4.06
4.5
Chelsea James
14W–18L career · 6 lines in 2026
32%67%<1%
4.06
Melinda Mooney
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
34%66%<1%
4.05
4.5
Caroline Baden
20W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
4.04
Tiffini Williams
24W–43L career · 3 lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.97
4.5
Christina Cung
25W–22L career · 6 lines in 2026
59%41%<1%
3.97
Leslie Eugenio
30W–31L career · 8 lines in 2026
3%95%2%
3.74
Sandy Beasley
5W–8L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.