Teams

2 Westwood Prince Ladybugs

2022 Richmond Adult 18 & Over Weekend · Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.14 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2022-05-22vs 15 MTC Resurgence 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrant Slegowski / Craig Heah vs Jeff Richman / Chris Gillam6-2, 6-4
2022-05-18vs 11 ACAC NedeffWon 10
W#1 DoublesGrant Slegowski / Craig Heah vs Majd Babik / Christopher Chandler5-7, 7-5, 1-0
2022-04-17vs 5 Richmond Tennisbums 4.0Won 10
W#1 DoublesGrant Slegowski / Todd Prince vs Nathan Maultsby / Ryan Joyce6-3, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Adult 18 & Over 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.24
Charles Wall III
published 4.5
4.23
Todd Prince
published
4.23
Ryan Baker
published
3.97
Grant Slegowski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.84
Greg Robinson
published 4
3.82
Craig Heah
published 4
3.82
Gil Elmaleh
published 4
3.81
Robert Wainscott
published
3.76
Chris Gerecke
published 4
3.75
William Pilc
published
3.75
Joseph Shutt
published
3.69
Michael Fanelli
published
3.59
Bryan Carr
published 4
3.55
Walker Reid
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Walker Reid + Robert Wainscott224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Charles Wall III
4W–2L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.24
Todd Prince
11W–8L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
Ryan Baker
29W–11L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Grant Slegowski
153W–43L career · 3 lines in 2022
58%42%<1%
3.97
4
Greg Robinson
6W–2L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%10%
3.84
4
Craig Heah
6W–3L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%9%
3.82
4
Gil Elmaleh
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%91%8%
3.82
Robert Wainscott
2W–2L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Chris Gerecke
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.76
William Pilc
13W–10L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.75
Joseph Shutt
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Michael Fanelli
5W–2L career · no lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Bryan Carr
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
3.59
Walker Reid
6W–6L career · no lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.55

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.