Teams

55 & Over W6.0 - CTH Rita Garcia

Adult 55 & Over 2022 · Adult 55 & Over W6.0

10 players · average NTRP 2.93 / PUERTO RICO

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#3 DoublesAna Garcia / Yadira Cardona vs Myrna Lopez / Dolores Rodriguez6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAna Garcia / Yadira Cardona vs Margaret Matos / Jossie Massa3-6, 4-6
W#1 DoublesSandra Ortiz / Rosa Montanez vs Maria Rivas / Maria Negron6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAna Garcia / Yadira Cardona vs Wanda DeJesus / Ailsa Delgado6-3, 1-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz vs Sandra Cruz / Ruth Rodriguez6-3, 6-1
L#1 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz vs Carmen Santos / Jossie Massa7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSandra Ortiz / Rosa Montanez vs Myrna Lopez / Marga Lopez6-3, 6-4
2022-02-13Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz vs Marga Lopez / Maria Gonzalez6-1, 6-1
L#1 DoublesAna Garcia / Yadira Cardona vs MARIA del MAR GARCIA / Ana Corrada2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesRosa Montanez / Sandra Ortiz vs Norma Rodriguez-Gomez / Anabel Rodriguez6-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Adult 55 & Over W6.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.62 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.19
Sandra Ortiz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Aida Baerga
published 3
2.77
2.52
Elba Rodriguez
published 3
2.50
Yadira Cardona
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.49
Ana Garcia
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.41
Norma Suarez
published
2.18
Elizabeth Melendez
published 2.5
Rosa Montanez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ana Garcia + Yadira Cardona2344% gamesnot enough data
Ana Garcia + Rosa Montanez1445% gamesnot enough data
Aida Baerga + Annette Torres-Morales404 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Melendez + Yadira Cardona044 matchesnot enough data
Elba Rodriguez + Annette Torres-Morales123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Sandra Ortiz
95W–78L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Aida Baerga
24W–31L career · no lines in 2022
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
Annette Torres-Morales
46W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Georganna Hildebrand
0W–12L career · type A · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Elba Rodriguez
18W–22L career · no lines in 2022
44%56%<1%
2.52
Yadira Cardona
21W–42L career · 4 lines in 2022
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Ana Garcia
46W–42L career · type A · 8 lines in 2022
0%53%47%
2.49
Norma Suarez
25W–39L career · no lines in 2022
75%25%<1%
2.41
2.5
Elizabeth Melendez
7W–23L career · no lines in 2022
0%99%1%
2.18
Rosa Montanez
7W–15L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.