Teams

Lata65stonessp

2023 Adult 65 & Over · Adult Women - 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.38 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult Women - 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.99 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.33
Debbie Gee
published 3.5
3.16
Susan Zais
published
3.10
Barbara Cross
published 3.5
3.06
Patricia Truesdale
published
3.04
Beverly Timmons
published 3.5
2.97
Kathi Sill
published
2.91
Jeanne Stone
published
2.86
Jo Norris
published
2.78
Pamela Skiles
published
2.73
Barbara Sellers
published 3
Katherine Keckeisen
published
Rennie Boulware
published
Roxanne Lamm
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Barbara Sellers + Jeanne Stone9852% games−1.7% vs expected
Pamela Skiles + Patricia Truesdale3743% games−6.5% vs expected
Pamela Skiles + Barbara Sellers4546% gamesnot enough data
Pamela Skiles + Jeanne Stone224 matchesnot enough data
Pamela Skiles + Beverly Timmons134 matchesnot enough data
Patricia Truesdale + Beverly Timmons044 matchesnot enough data
Barbara Sellers + Patricia Truesdale123 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Stone + Roxanne Lamm213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Debbie Gee
34W–30L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Susan Zais
75W–46L career · no lines in 2023
11%89%<1%
3.16
3.5
Barbara Cross
5W–7L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
Patricia Truesdale
5W–28L career · no lines in 2023
32%68%<1%
3.06
3.5
Beverly Timmons
9W–33L career · type A · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Kathi Sill
42W–88L career · no lines in 2023
59%41%<1%
2.97
Jeanne Stone
25W–31L career · no lines in 2023
75%25%<1%
2.91
Jo Norris
0W–5L career · no lines in 2023
85%15%<1%
2.86
Pamela Skiles
25W–58L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
2.78
3
Barbara Sellers
16W–26L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Katherine Keckeisen
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Rennie Boulware
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Roxanne Lamm
25W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.