Teams

RCSP Schwerin

2025 Pinellas Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 W Saturday

12 players · average NTRP 2.93 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-03-22vs Tarpon Topspin TitansLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarienne Hidalgo / Julia Schwerin vs Leanne Matthews / Betsy Rutkowski1-6, 1-6
2025-03-15vs Pinellas/Faraci/18&Over3.0WWon 10
W#3 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Susan Barham vs Joanna Johns / Dana Schoenbeck1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-01Won 10
W#2 SinglesJulia Schwerin vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2025-02-22vs Seminole Lake JordanLost 14
L#1 DoublesAmy Braswell / Susan Barham vs Michele Girardi / Valeska Dykes0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesKrista Healy vs Brandy Fernandez5-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Saari / Sara Armstrong vs Debra Edwards / Patty Anderson6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesAlissa Moyer vs Pamela Huff6-0, 6-3
L#3 DoublesDarienne Hidalgo / Beverly Encarnacion vs Debi Billington / Asheley Wardell5-7, 2-6
2025-02-15vs SPTC Holliday 3.0Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Jessica Gary vs Morgan Tucker / Petra Jessen5-7, 1-6
2025-01-25vs Countryside DunnWon 10
W#1 DoublesSusan Barham / Julia Schwerin vs Laura Baker / Kathleen Lucey6-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-01-18Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Beverly Encarnacion vs Patricia Smith / Stephanie Coleman0-6, 0-6
2025-01-11vs Ardea HueholtWon 10
W#2 DoublesJulia Schwerin / Susan Barham vs Amy Hill / Samantha Howell6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 W Saturday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.67 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Krista Healy
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Sara Armstrong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.81
Alissa Moyer
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.72
Julia Schwerin
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.70
Susan Barham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.60
Connie Yilmaz
published 3
2.57
Detsy Hallock
published 3
2.53
Beverly Encarnacion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Darienne Hidalgo
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.44
Janice Graham
published
Amy Braswell
published 2.5
Zhanna Thomas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Krista Healy
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Sara Armstrong
5W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
3
Alissa Moyer
4W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
1%92%8%
2.81
3
Julia Schwerin
34W–37L career · 7 lines in 2025
5%94%2%
2.72
Susan Barham
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
2.70
3
Connie Yilmaz
11W–20L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.60
3
Detsy Hallock
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Beverly Encarnacion
4W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
40%60%<1%
2.53
3
Darienne Hidalgo
8W–19L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
63%37%<1%
2.46
Janice Graham
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
69%31%<1%
2.44
2.5
Amy Braswell
no matches on record · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Zhanna Thomas
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.